These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3429172)

  • 1. Effects of improved contrast on lung-nodule detection. A clinical ROC study.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR; Armstrong JD; Mann H; Bragg DG; Mann FA; Tocino IB; Wojtowycz MM
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Oct; 22(10):772-80. PubMed ID: 3429172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance.
    Sherrier RH; Chiles C; Wilkinson WE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 3336719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lung nodule conspicuity using unsharp mask filters with storage-phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Li F; Sone S; Kiyono K
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 9059410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gray-scale inversion radiographic display for the detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs.
    Lungren MP; Samei E; Barnhart H; McAdams HP; Leder RA; Christensen JD; Wylie JD; Tan JW; Li X; Hurwitz LM
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(5):515-21. PubMed ID: 22920355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
    Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs.
    Sheline ME; Brikman I; Epstein DM; Mezrich JL; Kundel HL; Arenson RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 2783501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of unsharp masking and slit scanning techniques in chest radiography.
    Armstrong JD; Sorenson JA; Nelson JA; Tocino I; Lester PD; Janes JO; Niklason LT; Stanish W
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 6340155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
    Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.
    Foley WD; Wilson CR; Keyes GS; DiBianca FA; Scanlon GT; Schleuter D; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7291538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging.
    Müller RD; Von Koschitzki T; Hirche H; John V; Hering K; Gocke C; Turowski B
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Aug; 51(8):577-86. PubMed ID: 8761397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color radiography in lung nodule detection and characterization: comparison with conventional gray scale radiography.
    Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Lee KS; Chung MJ
    BMC Med Imaging; 2016 Aug; 16(1):48. PubMed ID: 27549084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photographic unsharp masking in chest radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Niklason LT; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 7275540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Kakeda S; Moriya J; Sato H; Aoki T; Watanabe H; Nakata H; Oda N; Katsuragawa S; Yamamoto K; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Feb; 182(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 14736690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.