These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34292056)

  • 1. Does the Size-Arrival Effect Occur With an Active Collision-Avoidance Task in an Immersive 3D Virtual Reality Environment?
    DeLucia PR; Braly AM; Savoy BR
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):956-965. PubMed ID: 34292056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging arrival times of incoming traffic vehicles is not a prerequisite for safely crossing an intersection: Differential effects of vehicle size and type in passive judgment and active driving tasks.
    Mathieu J; Bootsma RJ; Berthelon C; Montagne G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Feb; 173():1-12. PubMed ID: 27978421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Stroboscopic Training Improve Judgments of Time-to-Collision?
    Braly AM; DeLucia PR
    Hum Factors; 2020 Feb; 62(1):152-165. PubMed ID: 31009245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual strategies used for time-to-arrival judgments in driving.
    van Loon EM; Khashawi F; Underwood G
    Perception; 2010; 39(9):1216-29. PubMed ID: 21125949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of oncoming vehicle size on overtaking judgments.
    Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Jupe J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():163-70. PubMed ID: 26080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of motion and signalling on drivers' ability to predict intentions of other road users.
    Lee YM; Sheppard E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):202-8. PubMed ID: 27450792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's ability to estimate approaching vehicle time-to-arrival following training in a virtual pedestrian environment.
    Schwebel DC; Johnston A; McClure LA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(7):919-924. PubMed ID: 39088758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size speed bias or size arrival effect-How judgments of vehicles' approach speed and time to arrival are influenced by the vehicles' size.
    Petzoldt T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):132-7. PubMed ID: 27428866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-to-contact estimation errors among older drivers with useful field of view impairments.
    Rusch ML; Schall MC; Lee JD; Dawson JD; Edwards SV; Rizzo M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):284-91. PubMed ID: 27472816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Adjacent Vehicles on Judgments of a Lead Car During Car Following.
    Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Oberfeld D
    Hum Factors; 2016 Nov; 58(7):1096-1111. PubMed ID: 27280300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motorcycle accident risk could be inflated by a time to arrival illusion.
    Horswill MS; Helman S; Ardiles P; Wann JP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 16127340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collision avoidance behaviours while young adults avoid a virtual pedestrian approaching on a 45° angle under attentionally demanding conditions.
    Thompson BJ; Cinelli ME
    Hum Mov Sci; 2024 Jun; 95():103226. PubMed ID: 38728852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Road crossing decisions in real and virtual environments: A comparative study on simulator validity.
    Feldstein IT; Dyszak GN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105356. PubMed ID: 32059135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collision avoidance in persons with homonymous visual field defects under virtual reality conditions.
    Papageorgiou E; Hardiess G; Ackermann H; Wiethoelter H; Dietz K; Mallot HA; Schiefer U
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 22100816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving car drivers' perception of motorcycle motion through innovative headlight configurations.
    Cavallo V; Ranchet M; Pinto M; Espié S; Vienne F; Dang NT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():187-93. PubMed ID: 25988810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drivers' eye movements as a function of collision avoidance warning conditions in red light running scenarios.
    Zhang Y; Yan X; Li X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():185-197. PubMed ID: 27543896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural correlates of impaired collision avoidance in hemianopic patients.
    Papageorgiou E; Hardiess G; Wiethölter H; Ackermann H; Dietz K; Mallot HA; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):e198-205. PubMed ID: 22176680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intercepting a moving traffic gap while avoiding collision with lead and trail vehicles: gap-related and boundary-related influences on drivers' speed regulations during approach to an intersection.
    Louveton N; Montagne G; Berthelon C; Bootsma RJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1500-16. PubMed ID: 23122005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.