These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3429281)
1. [Assessing olfaction in general practice. A study of suitable odors]. Ganz H HNO; 1987 Dec; 35(12):511-4. PubMed ID: 3429281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening of olfactory function using the Biolfa olfactory test: investigations in patients with dysosmia. Bonfils P; Faulcon P; Avan P Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Nov; 124(9):1063-71. PubMed ID: 15513551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A pragmatic assessment of sense of smell]. Mösges R; Bartsch M; Hetzenecker A; Thiel R; Schmelzer B; Klimek L; Kurzeja A; Schlöndorff G HNO; 1990 Dec; 38(12):459-61. PubMed ID: 2086572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quantitative olfactometry: a technique of the results assessment]. Domrachev AA; Savchenkov IuI; Afon'kin VIu; Tolmacheva TV Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2004; (6):41-3. PubMed ID: 15699989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new clinical olfactory test to quantify olfactory deficiencies. Eloit C; Trotier D Rhinology; 1994 Jun; 32(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 7939140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the validity of a maximum likelihood adaptive staircase procedure for measurement of olfactory detection threshold in mice. Clevenger AC; Restrepo D Chem Senses; 2006 Jan; 31(1):9-26. PubMed ID: 16306319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of application of several psychophysical olfactory test methods in clinic]. Gu D; Li P Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(10):715-7. PubMed ID: 25129973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Olfactory dysfunction: its diagnosis and surgical treatment]. Morokhoev VI Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1990; (6):36-41. PubMed ID: 2075676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population. Ogihara H; Kobayashi M; Nishida K; Kitano M; Takeuchi K Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(6):404-10. PubMed ID: 22185745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Basics, methods and indications for objective olfactometry]. Welge-Lüssen A; Wolfensberger M; Kobal G; Hummel T Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Sep; 81(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 12357417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Response to the questionnaire, "Standardization of odors for the olfactory function test and others"]. Takagi S Jibiinkoka; 1971 May; 43(5):379-81. PubMed ID: 5165187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Olfactory dysfunction. Epidemiology, pathophsiological classification, diagnosis and therapy]. Förster G; Damm M; Gudziol H; Hummel T; Hüttenbrink KB; Just T; Muttray A; Seeber H; Temmel A; Welge-Lüssen A HNO; 2004 Aug; 52(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 15278233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Posturographic registration of body sway after odor stimulation]. Nieschalk M; Delank KW; Stoll W HNO; 1995 Apr; 43(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 7540605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electroencephalographic olfactometry (EEGO) analysis of odour responses in dogs. Hirano Y; Oosawa T; Tonosaki K Res Vet Sci; 2000 Dec; 69(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 11124098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of olfactory dysfunction of different etiologies in MRI and comparison with subjective and objective olfactometry. Goektas O; Fleiner F; Sedlmaier B; Bauknecht C Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 19070979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]