These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34292852)

  • 1. Mercury adsorption characteristics of carbon sorbent with low surface area.
    Park J; Lee SS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):1445-1452. PubMed ID: 34292852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adsorption of mercury by activated carbon prepared from dried sewage sludge in simulated flue gas.
    Park J; Lee SS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Oct; 68(10):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29693499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effective Manganese Ore Sorbent for Elemental Mercury Removal from Flue Gas.
    Yang Y; Miao S; Liu J; Wang Z; Yu Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Aug; 53(16):9957-9965. PubMed ID: 31369246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in simulated coal combustion flue gas.
    Rodríguez-Pérez J; López-Antón MA; Díaz-Somoano M; García R; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():869-77. PubMed ID: 23876255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of impregnation sequence of Pd/Ce/γ-Al
    Huo Q; Yue C; Wang Y; Han L; Wang J; Chen S; Bao W; Chang L; Xie K
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jun; 249():126164. PubMed ID: 32065997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultra-high adsorption of Hg
    Liu Y; Ma C; Zhou J; Zhu L; Cao L; Yang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(46):69450-69461. PubMed ID: 35576034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mercury removal from MSW incineration flue gas by mineral-based sorbents.
    Rumayor M; Svoboda K; Švehla J; Pohořelý M; Šyc M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():265-270. PubMed ID: 29248369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
    Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface compositions of carbon sorbents exposed to simulated low-rank coal flue gases.
    Olson ES; Crocker CR; Benson SA; Pavlish JH; Holmes MJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun; 55(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 16022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors Affecting Mercury Control in Utility Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon.
    Carey TR; Hargrove OW; Richardson CF; Chang R; Meserole FB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1998 Dec; 48(12):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 28060619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal-Fired Flue Gas over Sulfur-Containing Sorbent at Low Temperatures.
    Zhang G; Wang Z; Cui L; Zhang X; Chen S; Dong Y
    ACS Omega; 2019 Nov; 4(21):19399-19407. PubMed ID: 31763564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nanosized Cu-In spinel-type sulfides as efficient sorbents for elemental mercury removal from flue gas.
    Yu Y; Yang Y; Liu J; Ding J; Zhang J
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 796():149094. PubMed ID: 34328905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The application of regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in gas phase.
    Lopez-Anton MA; Fernández-Miranda N; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(24):24495-24503. PubMed ID: 27604126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of copper chloride-impregnated sorbents on mercury vapor control in an entrained-flow reactor system.
    Lee SS; Lee JY; Keener TC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Nov; 58(11):1458-62. PubMed ID: 19044161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of vapor-phase elemental mercury from stack emissions with sulfur-impregnated activated carbon.
    Sowlat MH; Abdollahi M; Gharibi H; Yunesian M; Rastkari N
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():1-34. PubMed ID: 24609516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential hazards of brominated carbon sorbents for mercury emission control.
    Bisson TM; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2496-502. PubMed ID: 25594726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs).
    Hsi HC; Rood MJ; Rostam-Abadi M; Chen S; Chang R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jul; 35(13):2785-91. PubMed ID: 11452610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiform Sulfur Adsorption Centers and Copper-Terminated Active Sites of Nano-CuS for Efficient Elemental Mercury Capture from Coal Combustion Flue Gas.
    Yang Z; Li H; Feng S; Li P; Liao C; Liu X; Zhao J; Yang J; Lee PH; Shih K
    Langmuir; 2018 Jul; 34(30):8739-8749. PubMed ID: 29983072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of bamboo-derived sorbents for mercury removal in gas phase.
    Siddiqui N; Don J; Mondal K; Mahajan A
    Environ Technol; 2011; 32(3-4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21780706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.