138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34293429)
1. Automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity: I. The decision scheme in the QSAR toolbox.
Kutsarova S; Mehmed A; Cherkezova D; Stoeva S; Georgiev M; Petkov T; Chapkanov A; Schultz TW; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105015. PubMed ID: 34293429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of the Verhaar scheme for predicting acute aquatic toxicity: improving predictions obtained from Toxtree ver. 2.6.
Ellison CM; Madden JC; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 139():146-54. PubMed ID: 26092094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR toolbox automatic workflow for the prediction of the acute toxicity of organic chemicals to fathead minnow.
Mombelli E; Pandard P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104893. PubMed ID: 33587933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling mechanisms that drive acute oral toxicity in mammals and its prediction via machine learning.
Wijeyesakere SJ; Auernhammer T; Parks A; Wilson D
Toxicol Sci; 2023 May; 193(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 36946286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
Kuseva C; Schultz TW; Yordanova D; Tankova K; Kutsarova S; Pavlov T; Chapkanov A; Georgiev M; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 105():51-61. PubMed ID: 30970268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade.
Schultz TW; Diderich R; Kuseva CD; Mekenyan OG
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():55-77. PubMed ID: 29934887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of in silico model predictions for mammalian acute oral toxicity and regulatory application in pesticide hazard and risk assessment.
Bishop PL; Mansouri K; Eckel WP; Lowit MB; Allen D; Blankinship A; Lowit AB; Harwood DE; Johnson T; Kleinstreuer NC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 May; 149():105614. PubMed ID: 38574841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the GHS Mixtures Equation for Predicting Acute Oral Toxicity.
Hamm J; Allen D; Ceger P; Flint T; Lowit A; O'Dell L; Tao J; Kleinstreuer N
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105007. PubMed ID: 34298086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using a Multifingerprint Similarity Approach.
Alberga D; Trisciuzzi D; Mansouri K; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O
Toxicol Sci; 2019 Feb; 167(2):484-495. PubMed ID: 30371864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a general baseline toxicity QSAR model for the fish embryo acute toxicity test.
Klüver N; Vogs C; Altenburger R; Escher BI; Scholz S
Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 164():164-173. PubMed ID: 27588575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions.
Abe A; Sezaki T; Kinoshita K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):279-298. PubMed ID: 31012352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling acute oral mammalian toxicity. 1. Definition of a quantifiable baseline effect.
Koleva YK; Cronin MT; Madden JC; Schwöbel JA
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1281-93. PubMed ID: 21557997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. QSAR modeling of acute toxicity on mammals caused by aromatic compounds: the case study using oral LD50 for rats.
Rasulev B; Kusić H; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J; Koprivanac N
J Environ Monit; 2010 May; 12(5):1037-44. PubMed ID: 21491673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extensive review of fish embryo acute toxicities for the prediction of GHS acute systemic toxicity categories.
Scholz S; Ortmann J; Klüver N; Léonard M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):572-9. PubMed ID: 24929227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in silico tools for evaluating rat oral acute toxicity.
Diaza RG; Manganelli S; Esposito A; Roncaglioni A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 25567032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. QSAR Toolbox - workflow and major functionalities.
Dimitrov SD; Diderich R; Sobanski T; Pavlov TS; Chankov GV; Chapkanov AS; Karakolev YH; Temelkov SG; Vasilev RA; Gerova KD; Kuseva CD; Todorova ND; Mehmed AM; Rasenberg M; Mekenyan OG
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Mar; 27(3):203-219. PubMed ID: 26892800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acute oral toxicity of nickel compounds.
Henderson RG; Durando J; Oller AR; Merkel DJ; Marone PA; Bates HK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 62(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 22333739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.
Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated integration of structural, biological and metabolic similarities to improve read-across.
Gadaleta D; Golbamaki Bakhtyari A; Lavado GJ; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
ALTEX; 2020; 37(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 32388568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Moore NP; Andrew DJ; Bjerke DL; Creton S; Dreher D; Holmes T; Prieto P; Seidle T; Rowan TG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23461858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
