These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34293429)

  • 1. Automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity: I. The decision scheme in the QSAR toolbox.
    Kutsarova S; Mehmed A; Cherkezova D; Stoeva S; Georgiev M; Petkov T; Chapkanov A; Schultz TW; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105015. PubMed ID: 34293429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals.
    Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of the Verhaar scheme for predicting acute aquatic toxicity: improving predictions obtained from Toxtree ver. 2.6.
    Ellison CM; Madden JC; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 139():146-54. PubMed ID: 26092094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR toolbox automatic workflow for the prediction of the acute toxicity of organic chemicals to fathead minnow.
    Mombelli E; Pandard P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104893. PubMed ID: 33587933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profiling mechanisms that drive acute oral toxicity in mammals and its prediction via machine learning.
    Wijeyesakere SJ; Auernhammer T; Parks A; Wilson D
    Toxicol Sci; 2023 May; 193(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 36946286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
    Kuseva C; Schultz TW; Yordanova D; Tankova K; Kutsarova S; Pavlov T; Chapkanov A; Georgiev M; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 105():51-61. PubMed ID: 30970268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade.
    Schultz TW; Diderich R; Kuseva CD; Mekenyan OG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():55-77. PubMed ID: 29934887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of in silico model predictions for mammalian acute oral toxicity and regulatory application in pesticide hazard and risk assessment.
    Bishop PL; Mansouri K; Eckel WP; Lowit MB; Allen D; Blankinship A; Lowit AB; Harwood DE; Johnson T; Kleinstreuer NC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 May; 149():105614. PubMed ID: 38574841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the GHS Mixtures Equation for Predicting Acute Oral Toxicity.
    Hamm J; Allen D; Ceger P; Flint T; Lowit A; O'Dell L; Tao J; Kleinstreuer N
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105007. PubMed ID: 34298086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using a Multifingerprint Similarity Approach.
    Alberga D; Trisciuzzi D; Mansouri K; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O
    Toxicol Sci; 2019 Feb; 167(2):484-495. PubMed ID: 30371864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a general baseline toxicity QSAR model for the fish embryo acute toxicity test.
    Klüver N; Vogs C; Altenburger R; Escher BI; Scholz S
    Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 164():164-173. PubMed ID: 27588575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions.
    Abe A; Sezaki T; Kinoshita K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):279-298. PubMed ID: 31012352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling acute oral mammalian toxicity. 1. Definition of a quantifiable baseline effect.
    Koleva YK; Cronin MT; Madden JC; Schwöbel JA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1281-93. PubMed ID: 21557997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QSAR modeling of acute toxicity on mammals caused by aromatic compounds: the case study using oral LD50 for rats.
    Rasulev B; Kusić H; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J; Koprivanac N
    J Environ Monit; 2010 May; 12(5):1037-44. PubMed ID: 21491673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extensive review of fish embryo acute toxicities for the prediction of GHS acute systemic toxicity categories.
    Scholz S; Ortmann J; Klüver N; Léonard M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):572-9. PubMed ID: 24929227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of in silico tools for evaluating rat oral acute toxicity.
    Diaza RG; Manganelli S; Esposito A; Roncaglioni A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 25567032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QSAR Toolbox - workflow and major functionalities.
    Dimitrov SD; Diderich R; Sobanski T; Pavlov TS; Chankov GV; Chapkanov AS; Karakolev YH; Temelkov SG; Vasilev RA; Gerova KD; Kuseva CD; Todorova ND; Mehmed AM; Rasenberg M; Mekenyan OG
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Mar; 27(3):203-219. PubMed ID: 26892800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute oral toxicity of nickel compounds.
    Henderson RG; Durando J; Oller AR; Merkel DJ; Marone PA; Bates HK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 62(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 22333739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.
    Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated integration of structural, biological and metabolic similarities to improve read-across.
    Gadaleta D; Golbamaki Bakhtyari A; Lavado GJ; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    ALTEX; 2020; 37(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 32388568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.