243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34293981)
1. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).
Dennison SR; Thakkar T; Kan A; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jun; 153(6):3543-3558. PubMed ID: 37390320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancement of interaural level differences for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Gajecki T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108313. PubMed ID: 34340023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Klingel M; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Anderson SR; Easter K; Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3232. PubMed ID: 31795662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.
Buck AN; Buchholz S; Schnupp JW; Rosskothen-Kuhl N
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3785. PubMed ID: 36882473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial acuity in 2-to-3-year-old children with normal acoustic hearing, unilateral cochlear implants, and bilateral cochlear implants.
Grieco-Calub TM; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 22517185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.
Ehlers E; Kan A; Winn MB; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1724. PubMed ID: 27106319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.
Dennison SR; Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1262-1272. PubMed ID: 34882619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
Vollmer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
