These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Vineberg operation: a review of the birth and impact of this surgical technique. Katrapati P; George JC Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 86(5):1713-6. PubMed ID: 19049791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective. Serruys PW; Ono M; Garg S; Hara H; Kawashima H; Pompilio G; Andreini D; Holmes DR; Onuma Y; King Iii SB J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 78(4):384-407. PubMed ID: 34294273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Perspective Current State After 25 Years of Start. Elassal AA; Al-Ebrahim K; Makhdoom AM; Fatani M; Ibrahim M Heart Surg Forum; 2021 Apr; 24(2):E392-E401. PubMed ID: 33973513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [History of surgical treatment of atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries--the first 100 years]. Perić M; Huskić R; Nastasić S; Jocić Z; Nezić D; Vuk F; Nesković A; Bojić M Acta Chir Iugosl; 2000; 47(1-2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10953360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A perspective on the development of coronary revascularization. Sobel BE Coron Artery Dis; 2010 May; 21(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 20215966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization. Head SJ; Milojevic M; Daemen J; Ahn JM; Boersma E; Christiansen EH; Domanski MJ; Farkouh ME; Flather M; Fuster V; Hlatky MA; Holm NR; Hueb WA; Kamalesh M; Kim YH; Mäkikallio T; Mohr FW; Papageorgiou G; Park SJ; Rodriguez AE; Sabik JF; Stables RH; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):386-398. PubMed ID: 30025574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What will surgical coronary revascularization look like in 25 years? Caliskan E; Emmert MY; Falk V Curr Opin Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 34(6):637-644. PubMed ID: 31464771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Moreno PR; Stone GW; Gonzalez-Lengua CA; Puskas JD J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 76(3):321-333. PubMed ID: 32674795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Historical Milestones in the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease over the Last Half Century. Weintraub WS; Taggart DP; Mancini GBJ; Brown DL; Boden WE Am J Med; 2018 Nov; 131(11):1285-1292. PubMed ID: 29959899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trials Comparing Percutaneous And Surgical Myocardial Revascularization: A Review. De Palo M; Quagliara T; Dachille A; Carrozzo A; Giardinelli F; Mureddu S; Mastro F; Rotunno C; Paparella D Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2019; 14(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 30706789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review. May SA; Wilson JM Tex Heart Inst J; 2009; 36(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 19876412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Head SJ; Davierwala PM; Serruys PW; Redwood SR; Colombo A; Mack MJ; Morice MC; Holmes DR; Feldman TE; Ståhle E; Underwood P; Dawkins KD; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW Eur Heart J; 2014 Oct; 35(40):2821-30. PubMed ID: 24849105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]