These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34294420)

  • 21. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
    Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal discrepancy of 3-unit Co-Cr metal copings fabricated with additive and subtractive manners: A comparative study.
    Onoral O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1274-1280. PubMed ID: 32913168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3D printing.
    Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Bhering CLB; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jul; 122(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 30922558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal and internal fit and fracture resistance of three-unit provisional restorations fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional methods.
    Falahchai M; Rahimabadi S; Khabazkar G; Babaee Hemmati Y; Neshandar Asli H
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1404-1412. PubMed ID: 35871472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM frameworks in multiple implant-supported restorations: Scanning and milling error analysis.
    Uribarri A; Bilbao-Uriarte E; Segurola A; Ugarte D; Verdugo F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 31454146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant Prosthodontic Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Co-Cr Implant Frameworks Manufactured Through Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
    Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Özcan M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):698–707. PubMed ID: 30892285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods.
    Park JY; Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Bae SY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 27174406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of marginal fit of an implant-supported framework fabricated by 3D printing versus subtractive manufacturing technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Thakur J; Parlani S; Shivakumar S; Jajoo K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):301-309. PubMed ID: 34147238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks.
    Kaleli N; Ural Ç; Özköylü G; Duran İ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):922-928. PubMed ID: 30661880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Pure titanium denture large-span frameworks additively manufactured with selective laser melting].
    Luo XP; Wei YX; Huang HN; Hu DD; Pang EL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):646-651. PubMed ID: 34275219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vertical microgap and passivity of fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques.
    Berejuk HM; Shimizu RH; de Mattias Sartori IA; Valgas L; Tiossi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1064-70. PubMed ID: 25216131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trueness and marginal fit of implant-supported complete-arch fixed prosthesis frameworks made of high-performance polymers and titanium: An explorative in-vitro study.
    Abou-Ayash S; Schimmel M; Özcan M; Ozcelik B; Brägger U; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103784. PubMed ID: 34419479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.