BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34296029)

  • 1. A retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes in single-level degenerative lumbar disease undergoing anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Moses ZB; Razvi S; Oh SY; Platt A; Keegan KC; Hamati F; Witiw C; David BT; Fontes RBV; Deutsch H; O'Toole JE; Fessler RG
    J Spine Surg; 2021 Jun; 7(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 34296029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Lumbosacral Fusion Grade in Patients after Transforaminal and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Liu J; Xie R; Chin CT; Rajagopalan P; Duan PG; Li B; Burch S; Berven SH; Mummaneni PV; Chou D
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Sep; 15(9):2334-2341. PubMed ID: 37526121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Ajiboye RM; Alas H; Mosich GM; Sharma A; Pourtaheri S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 May; 31(4):E230-E238. PubMed ID: 28622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
    Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage vs. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation.
    Lee Y; Heard JC; McCurdy MA; Lambrechts MJ; Fras SI; Purtill W; Millar B; Kolowrat S; Issa TZ; D'Antonio ND; Rihn JA; Kurd MF; Kaye ID; Canseco JA; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37737684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang SD; Chen JW; Jiang LS
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Sep; 132(9):1259-66. PubMed ID: 22622795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.
    Hsieh PC; Koski TR; O'Shaughnessy BA; Sugrue P; Salehi S; Ondra S; Liu JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct; 7(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17933310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Oblique Self-anchored Stand-alone Cages for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With 2-year Follow-up.
    Kuang L; Wang B; Lü G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(21):E1259-E1265. PubMed ID: 28277385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Crandall DG; Revella J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.