246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34296707)
21. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.
Haentjens P; De Groote K; Annemans L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):507-17. PubMed ID: 15365714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease in the Elderly.
Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Tetreault L; Fehlings MG; McGirt MJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77 Suppl 4():S116-24. PubMed ID: 26378349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective study of lumbar facet arthroplasty in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis: cost-effective assessment from the Total Posterior Spine system (TOPS
Ament JD; Petros J; Zabehi T; Yee R; Johnson JP; Vokshoor A
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1001-1014. PubMed ID: 38253290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years.
Tosteson AN; Lurie JD; Tosteson TD; Skinner JS; Herkowitz H; Albert T; Boden SD; Bridwell K; Longley M; Andersson GB; Blood EA; Grove MR; Weinstein JN;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Dec; 149(12):845-53. PubMed ID: 19075203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Determining Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using the Short Form-6D Utility Measure.
Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Bozic KJ; Kurtz SM; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):351-354. PubMed ID: 27665243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion.
Passias PG; Brown AE; Alas H; Bortz CA; Pierce KE; Hassanzadeh H; Labaran LA; Puvanesarajah V; Vasquez-Montes D; Wang E; Ihejirika RC; Diebo BG; Lafage V; Lafage R; Sciubba DM; Janjua MB; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Gerling MC
Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33069859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.
Dakin H; Eibich P; Beard D; Gray A; Price A
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jul; 102-B(7):950-958. PubMed ID: 32600136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Davis BJ; Fulchiero E; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21959840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Aas E; Lydersen S; Andresen H; Rønning R; Nygaard ØP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 25608246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Simple Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Kayalar AE; Onen MR; Gerilmez A; Naderi S
Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(5):643-650. PubMed ID: 31353433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese: A Computer Model-Based Evaluation.
McLawhorn AS; Southren D; Wang YC; Marx RG; Dodwell ER
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):e6. PubMed ID: 26791039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis.
Jenkins PJ; Clement ND; Hamilton DF; Gaston P; Patton JT; Howie CR
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 23307684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
