These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3429732)
21. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of gating as a function of number of flanking bands and masker bandwidth. Hatch DR; Arné BC; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3768-74. PubMed ID: 7790654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency. Haggard MP; Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 2380439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm. McFadden D; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1615-20. PubMed ID: 3693702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comodulation masking release in a songbird. Klump GM; Langemann U Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):157-64. PubMed ID: 8567432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm. Klink KB; Dierker H; Beutelmann R; Klump GM J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19763691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression. Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2759-70. PubMed ID: 12083211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis. Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 3958319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure. Cokely JA; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of signal frequency and masker level on the frequency regions responsible for the overshoot effect. Carlyon RP; White LJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1034-41. PubMed ID: 1556305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands? Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics. Epp B; Verhey JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of modulation coherence on signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands. Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 2212294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. Ewert SD; Verhey JL; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2921-31. PubMed ID: 12509013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment. Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Hall JW; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):435-51. PubMed ID: 8423260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise. Hall JW; Harvey AD J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1699-703. PubMed ID: 6520307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]