These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3429736)

  • 41. [The context effect in speech recognition of sentences].
    Züst HJ; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Jun; 74(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 7662083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lexical mediation between sight and sound in speechreading.
    Repp BH; Frost R; Zsiga E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 1636006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Single band amplitude envelope cues as an aid to speechreading.
    Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 1775660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perceptual Restoration in Speechreading by Adults With Profound Hearing Loss.
    Jain S; Kumar RT; Jain P
    Am Ann Deaf; 2022; 167(3):303-312. PubMed ID: 36314163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level.
    Martin FN; Digiovanni D
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 422425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Audio-visual perception of compressed speech by profoundly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Drullman R; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 9193734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults: More Than Just Informational Masking.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):482-4. PubMed ID: 25587669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cued Speech and the reception of spoken language.
    Nicholls GH; Ling D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 7120965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.