These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3429738)

  • 1. The Supreme Court and public policy.
    Scearse PD
    J Prof Nurs; 1987; 3(6):326, 376. PubMed ID: 3429738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Republican schoolmaster: the U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion.
    Franklin CH; Kosaki LC
    Am Polit Sci Rev; 1989 Sep; 83(3):751-71. PubMed ID: 11656011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles.
    Noonan JT
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: the United States Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Tyler TR; Mitchell G
    Duke Law J; 1994 Feb; 43(4):703-815. PubMed ID: 11656384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letting the states set abortion policy.
    Rosenblum VG
    Christ Century; 1989 Mar; 106(8):252-3. PubMed ID: 11655921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion 1980: the debate continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disorder in the court: physician-assisted suicide and the Constitution.
    Burt RA
    Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):965-81. PubMed ID: 11865918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationality review and the politics of public health.
    Burris S
    Villanova Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 34(5):933-82. PubMed ID: 11651166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age.
    Halva-Neubauer G
    Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A law without honor.
    Casey RP
    Hum Life Rev; 1993; 19(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 11656243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population policy and law in the United States.
    Barnett LD
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1980; 3(1):95-127. PubMed ID: 11661859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The right to procreate: the dilemma of overpopulation and the United States judiciary.
    Bolner J; Jacobsen R
    Loyola Law Rev; 1979; 25(2):235-62. PubMed ID: 11661912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: beyond rights talk to informed public policy.
    Emanuel EJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):983-1014. PubMed ID: 11865919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion still a constitutional issue.
    Lancet; 1983 Apr; 1(8329):866-7. PubMed ID: 11644255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted suicide issue moves to Supreme Court.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1996 Dec; 26(26):421, 423-430. PubMed ID: 11660269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surrogate motherhood: an argument for denial of specific performance.
    Suh MM
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1989; 22(3):357-95. PubMed ID: 11650441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.