129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34297680)
1. A Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Esparza-Reig J; Guillén-Riquelme A; Martí-Vilar M; González-Sala F
Psicothema; 2021 Aug; 33(3):490-499. PubMed ID: 34297680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
Boudreau B; Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index.
Holtgraves T
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 18704661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.
Anselmi P; Colledani D; Andreotti A; Robusto E; Fabbris L; Vian P; Genetti B; Mortali C; Minutillo A; Mastrobattista L; Pacifici R
Assessment; 2022 Oct; 29(7):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 34036842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: an evaluation of the scale and its accompanying profiler software in a clinical setting.
Young MM; Wohl MJ
J Gambl Stud; 2011 Sep; 27(3):467-85. PubMed ID: 20978826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.
Colasante E; Gori M; Bastiani L; Scalese M; Siciliano V; Molinaro S
J Gambl Stud; 2014 Dec; 30(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 23740346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SOGS and CGPI: parallel comparison on a diverse population.
Young M; Stevens M
J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):337-56. PubMed ID: 18327633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
