These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34298114)
1. Long-term cost-effectiveness of glass hybrid versus composite in permanent molars. Schwendicke F; Basso M; Markovic D; Turkun LS; Miletić I J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103751. PubMed ID: 34298114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of glass hybrid versus composite in a multi-country randomized trial. Schwendicke F; Rossi JG; Krois J; Basso M; Peric T; Turkun LS; Miletić I J Dent; 2021 Apr; 107():103614. PubMed ID: 33617942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Managing molars with severe molar-incisor hypomineralization: A cost-effectiveness analysis within German healthcare. Elhennawy K; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Manton DJ; Paris S; Schwendicke F J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():65-71. PubMed ID: 28579384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoring root-canal treated molars: Cost-effectiveness-analysis of direct versus indirect restorations. Schwendicke F; Stolpe M J Dent; 2018 Oct; 77():37-42. PubMed ID: 30006116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of school-based caries screening using transillumination. Schwendicke F; Bombeck L J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104635. PubMed ID: 37541420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations. Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Schwendicke F J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():41-47. PubMed ID: 27575986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glass hybrid versus composite for non-carious cervical lesions: Survival, restoration quality and costs in randomized controlled trial after 3 years. Schwendicke F; Müller A; Seifert T; Jeggle-Engbert LM; Paris S; Göstemeyer G J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103689. PubMed ID: 33979577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of managing cavitated primary molar caries lesions: A randomized trial in Germany. Schwendicke F; Krois J; Splieth CH; Innes N; Robertson M; Schmoeckel J; Santamaria RM J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():40-45. PubMed ID: 29859224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amalgam Alternatives: Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analysis. Schwendicke F; Göstemeyer G; Stolpe M; Krois J J Dent Res; 2018 Nov; 97(12):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 29928832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct pulp capping after a carious exposure versus root canal treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Schwendicke F; Stolpe M J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1764-70. PubMed ID: 25218524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting Proximal Secondary Caries Lesions: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Schwendicke F; Brouwer F; Paris S; Stolpe M J Dent Res; 2016 Feb; 95(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 26574493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of the Hall Technique in a Randomized Trial. Schwendicke F; Krois J; Robertson M; Splieth C; Santamaria R; Innes N J Dent Res; 2019 Jan; 98(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 30216734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of caries-preventive fluoride varnish applications in clinic settings among patients of low, moderate and high risk. Schwendicke F; Splieth CH; Thomson WM; Reda S; Stolpe M; Foster Page L Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 46(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 28682498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Economic Evaluation of a Comprehensive School-Based Caries Prevention Program. Huang SS; Ruff RR; Niederman R JDR Clin Trans Res; 2019 Oct; 4(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31009589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retaining or replacing molars with furcation involvement: a cost-effectiveness comparison of different strategies. Schwendicke F; Graetz C; Stolpe M; Dörfer CE J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Nov; 41(11):1090-7. PubMed ID: 25255893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]