These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34298348)
41. Chemical and microbiological characterization of pig manures and digestates. Sun K; Jiang L; Ye Q; Wang Q; Liao D; Chang X; Xi S; He R Environ Technol; 2023 May; 44(13):1916-1925. PubMed ID: 34882526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. Massé DI; Masse L; Xia Y; Gilbert Y J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E112-20. PubMed ID: 19855002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude. Martí-Herrero J; Alvarez R; Cespedes R; Rojas MR; Conde V; Aliaga L; Balboa M; Danov S Bioresour Technol; 2015 Apr; 181():238-46. PubMed ID: 25656868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Huong LQ; Madsen H; Anh le X; Ngoc PT; Dalsgaard A Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():53-7. PubMed ID: 24140681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Effect of Digested Manure on Biogas Productivity and Microstructure Evolution of Corn Stalks in Anaerobic Cofermentation. Lv Z; Feng L; Shao L; Kou W; Liu P; Gao P; Dong X; Yu M; Wang J; Zhang D Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5214369. PubMed ID: 29850531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Influence of the Composition of the Initial Mixtures on the Physicochemical and Biological Properties and Spectral Characteristics of Composts]. Song CH; Li MX; Wei ZM; Xi BD; Zhao Y; Jia X; Liu YR; Liu DM Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2015 Aug; 35(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 26672307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment--a literature review. Sakar S; Yetilmezsoy K; Kocak E Waste Manag Res; 2009 Feb; 27(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 19220987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Swine manure valorization in fabrication of nutrition and energy. Giwa AS; Ali N; Asif M Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):9921-9933. PubMed ID: 33074416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Energy and Nutrient Recovery from Sewage Sludge and Manure via Anaerobic Digestion with Hydrothermal Pretreatment. Fang C; Huang R; Dykstra CM; Jiang R; Pavlostathis SG; Tang Y Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 54(2):1147-1156. PubMed ID: 31790234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simultaneous biogas and biogas slurry production from co-digestion of pig manure and corn straw: Performance optimization and microbial community shift. Ning J; Zhou M; Pan X; Li C; Lv N; Wang T; Cai G; Wang R; Li J; Zhu G Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jun; 282():37-47. PubMed ID: 30851572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of anaerobic digestion characteristics and kinetics of four livestock manures with different substrate concentrations. Li K; Liu R; Sun C Bioresour Technol; 2015 Dec; 198():133-40. PubMed ID: 26386415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with rice straw: economic & energy feasibility. Silvestre G; Gómez MP; Pascual A; Ruiz B Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):745-55. PubMed ID: 23306251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Anaerobic treatment of lignocellulosic material to co-produce methane and digested fiber for ethanol biorefining. Maclellan J; Chen R; Kraemer R; Zhong Y; Liu Y; Liao W Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 130():418-23. PubMed ID: 23313688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Enhancement of bioenergy recovery from agricultural wastes through recycling of cellulosic alcoholic fermentation vinasse for anaerobic co-digestion. Meng L; Jin K; Yi R; Chen M; Peng J; Pan Y Bioresour Technol; 2020 Sep; 311():123511. PubMed ID: 32417660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Temporal and spatial variability of livestock and poultry productions and manure nutrients in Shanxi Province, China]. Zhang JJ; Guo CX; Qin W; Zhang Q Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 27(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 27228611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improved biogas production of dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Xiao Y; Yang H; Yang H; Wang H; Zheng D; Liu Y; Pu X; Deng L Bioresour Technol; 2019 Dec; 294():122188. PubMed ID: 31569044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparisons of pollution characteristics, emission situations, and mass loads for heavy metals in the manures of different livestock and poultry in China. Liu WR; Zeng D; She L; Su WX; He DC; Wu GY; Ma XR; Jiang S; Jiang CH; Ying GG Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 734():139023. PubMed ID: 32460066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Kafle GK; Chen L Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():492-502. PubMed ID: 26531046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with three crop residues for biogas production. Li J; Wei L; Duan Q; Hu G; Zhang G Bioresour Technol; 2014 Mar; 156():307-13. PubMed ID: 24525215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. Astals S; Nolla-Ardèvol V; Mata-Alvarez J Bioresour Technol; 2012 Apr; 110():63-70. PubMed ID: 22341889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]