758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34299288)
1. Comparison of De Novo Assembly Strategies for Bacterial Genomes.
Zhang P; Jiang D; Wang Y; Yao X; Luo Y; Yang Z
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 34299288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes.
De Maio N; Shaw LP; Hubbard A; George S; Sanderson ND; Swann J; Wick R; AbuOun M; Stubberfield E; Hoosdally SJ; Crook DW; Peto TEA; Sheppard AE; Bailey MJ; Read DS; Anjum MF; Walker AS; Stoesser N; On Behalf Of The Rehab Consortium
Microb Genom; 2019 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 31483244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completion of draft bacterial genomes by long-read sequencing of synthetic genomic pools.
Derakhshani H; Bernier SP; Marko VA; Surette MG
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):519. PubMed ID: 32727443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polishing the Oxford Nanopore long-read assemblies of bacterial pathogens with Illumina short reads to improve genomic analyses.
Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
Genomics; 2021 May; 113(3):1366-1377. PubMed ID: 33716184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are we there yet? Benchmarking low-coverage nanopore long-read sequencing for the assembling of mitochondrial genomes using the vulnerable silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis.
Baeza JA; García-De León FJ
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):320. PubMed ID: 35459089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ONT and CCS sequencing technologies on the polyploid genome of a medicinal plant showed that high error rate of ONT reads are not suitable for self-correction.
Zeng P; Tian Z; Han Y; Zhang W; Zhou T; Peng Y; Hu H; Cai J
Chin Med; 2022 Aug; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 35945546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes: insights and considerations.
Cosma BM; Shirali Hossein Zade R; Jordan EN; van Lent P; Peng C; Pillay S; Abeel T
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 38000912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing.
Sanderson ND; Hopkins KMV; Colpus M; Parker M; Lipworth S; Crook D; Stoesser N
Microb Genom; 2024 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 38713194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of strategies for the assembly of diverse bacterial genomes using MinION long-read sequencing.
Goldstein S; Beka L; Graf J; Klassen JL
BMC Genomics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 30626323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing assembly strategies for third-generation sequencing technologies across different genomes.
Espinosa E; Bautista R; Fernandez I; Larrosa R; Zapata EL; Plata O
Genomics; 2023 Sep; 115(5):110700. PubMed ID: 37598732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of assembly methods combining long-reads and short-reads to obtain
Shin SC; Choi W; Lee J; Kim HJ; Kim HW
3 Biotech; 2020 Nov; 10(11):480. PubMed ID: 33094089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in interrogating bacteria and fly genomes.
Tvedte ES; Gasser M; Sparklin BC; Michalski J; Hjelmen CE; Johnston JS; Zhao X; Bromley R; Tallon LJ; Sadzewicz L; Rasko DA; Dunning Hotopp JC
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33768248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. De novo assembly of the Indian blue peacock (Pavo cristatus) genome using Oxford Nanopore technology and Illumina sequencing.
Dhar R; Seethy A; Pethusamy K; Singh S; Rohil V; Purkayastha K; Mukherjee I; Goswami S; Singh R; Raj A; Srivastava T; Acharya S; Rajashekhar B; Karmakar S
Gigascience; 2019 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 31077316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction.
Sanderson ND; Kapel N; Rodger G; Webster H; Lipworth S; Street TL; Peto T; Crook D; Stoesser N
Microb Genom; 2023 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36748454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A high-quality de novo genome assembly based on nanopore sequencing of a wild-caught coconut rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros).
Filipović I; Rašić G; Hereward J; Gharuka M; Devine GJ; Furlong MJ; Etebari K
BMC Genomics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):426. PubMed ID: 35672676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.
Bogaerts B; Van den Bossche A; Verhaegen B; Delbrassinne L; Mattheus W; Nouws S; Godfroid M; Hoffman S; Roosens NHC; De Keersmaecker SCJ; Vanneste K
J Clin Microbiol; 2024 May; 62(5):e0157623. PubMed ID: 38441926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do we still need Illumina sequencing data? Evaluating Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10.4.1 flow cells and the Rapid v14 library prep kit for Gram negative bacteria whole genome assemblies.
Lerminiaux N; Fakharuddin K; Mulvey MR; Mataseje L
Can J Microbiol; 2024 May; 70(5):178-189. PubMed ID: 38354391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome assembly using Nanopore-guided long and error-free DNA reads.
Madoui MA; Engelen S; Cruaud C; Belser C; Bertrand L; Alberti A; Lemainque A; Wincker P; Aury JM
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):327. PubMed ID: 25927464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology for genome analysis of Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis, and Brucella suis.
Linde J; Brangsch H; Hölzer M; Thomas C; Elschner MC; Melzer F; Tomaso H
BMC Genomics; 2023 May; 24(1):258. PubMed ID: 37173617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can we use it? On the utility of de novo and reference-based assembly of Nanopore data for plant plastome sequencing.
Scheunert A; Dorfner M; Lingl T; Oberprieler C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0226234. PubMed ID: 32208422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
