These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34299733)

  • 1. Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research.
    Sofi-Mahmudi A; Iranparvar P; Shakiba M; Shamsoddin E; Mohammad-Rahimi H; Naseri S; Motie P; Tovani-Palone MR; Mesgarpour B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study.
    Babić A; Barcot O; Visković T; Šarić F; Kirkovski A; Barun I; Križanac Z; Ananda RA; Fuentes Barreiro YV; Malih N; Dimcea DA; Ordulj J; Weerasekara I; Spezia M; Žuljević MF; Šuto J; Tancredi L; Pijuk A; Sammali S; Iascone V; von Groote T; Poklepović Peričić T; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):430-440. PubMed ID: 38262609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews.
    Faggion CM; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcón MA; Diaz KT
    J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():63-68. PubMed ID: 30342067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
    Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Vukicevic I; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 32993499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool.
    Martimbianco ALC; Sá KMM; Santos GM; Santos EM; Pacheco RL; Riera R
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(3):469-472. PubMed ID: 36820779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.
    Propadalo I; Tranfic M; Vuka I; Barcot O; Pericic TP; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():10-17. PubMed ID: 30312657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews.
    Kabir A; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Karimi Behnagh A; Eidkhani V; Baradaran HR; Kabiri P; Haghdoost A; Mesgarpour B
    Arch Iran Med; 2022 Jun; 25(6):375-382. PubMed ID: 35943017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are Neonatal Trials Better Conducted and Reported over the Last 6 Decades? An Analysis on Their Risk-of-Bias Status in Cochrane Reviews.
    Lai NM; Ong JMJ; Chen KH; Chaiyakunapruk N; Ovelman C; Soll R
    Neonatology; 2019; 116(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 31108494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
    Brettschneider C; Lühmann D; Raspe H
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2011 Feb; 7():Doc01. PubMed ID: 21468289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
    Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
    Babic A; Tokalic R; Amílcar Silva Cunha J; Novak I; Suto J; Vidak M; Miosic I; Vuka I; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30953448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
    Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
    Craig SS; Dalziel SR; Powell CV; Graudins A; Babl FE; Lunny C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD012977. PubMed ID: 32767571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014: A methodology study.
    Saltaji H; Ospina MB; Armijo-Olivo S; Agarwal S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Sep; 147(9):720-728.e1. PubMed ID: 27155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.