228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34299949)
1. Bioinformatics Approach to Mitigate Mislabeling in EU Seafood Market and Protect Consumer Health.
Vindigni G; Pulvirenti A; Alaimo S; Monaco C; Spina D; Peri I
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FISH-BOL and seafood identification: geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada.
Hanner R; Becker S; Ivanova NV; Steinke D
Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():106-22. PubMed ID: 21980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of DNA barcoding to reveal species composition of convenience seafood.
Huxley-Jones E; Shaw JL; Fletcher C; Parnell J; Watts PC
Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 22268756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survey of mislabelling across finfish supply chain reveals mislabelling both outside and within Canada.
Shehata HR; Bourque D; Steinke D; Chen S; Hanner R
Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():723-729. PubMed ID: 31108801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA barcoding unveils a high rate of mislabeling in a commercial freshwater catfish from Brazil.
Carvalho DC; Neto DA; Brasil BS; Oliveira DA
Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():97-105. PubMed ID: 21707317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraud in highly appreciated fish detected from DNA in Europe may undermine the Development Goal of sustainable fishing in Africa.
Blanco-Fernandez C; Ardura A; Masiá P; Rodriguez N; Voces L; Fernandez-Raigoso M; Roca A; Machado-Schiaffino G; Dopico E; Garcia-Vazquez E
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11423. PubMed ID: 34075165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA barcoding reveals global and local influences on patterns of mislabeling and substitution in the trade of fish in Mexico.
Munguia-Vega A; Terrazas-Tapia R; Dominguez-Contreras JF; Reyna-Fabian M; Zapata-Morales P
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265960. PubMed ID: 35421106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Could do better! A high school market survey of fish labelling in Sydney, Australia, using DNA barcodes.
Mitchell A; Rothbart A; Frankham G; Johnson RN; Neaves LE
PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7138. PubMed ID: 31231598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding validates species labelling of certified seafood.
Barendse J; Roel A; Longo C; Andriessen L; Webster LMI; Ogden R; Neat F
Curr Biol; 2019 Mar; 29(6):R198-R199. PubMed ID: 30889387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences of seafood mislabeling for marine populations and fisheries management.
Kroetz K; Luque GM; Gephart JA; Jardine SL; Lee P; Chicojay Moore K; Cole C; Steinkruger A; Donlan CJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30318-30323. PubMed ID: 33199620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA Barcode Identification of Fish Products from Guiyang Markets in Southwestern People's Republic of China.
Tang Q; Luo QI; Duan Q; Deng L; Zhang R
J Food Prot; 2022 Apr; 85(4):583-590. PubMed ID: 34995351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lab experience with seafood control at the undergraduate level: Cephalopods as a case study.
Fernández S; Rodríguez-Muñiz LJ; Molina J; Muñiz-Rodríguez L; Jiménez J; García-Vázquez E; Borrell YJ
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2020 May; 48(3):236-246. PubMed ID: 31944524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple drivers behind mislabeling of fish from artisanal fisheries in La Paz, Mexico.
Munguia-Vega A; Weaver AH; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Peckham H
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10750. PubMed ID: 33575131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants.
Willette DA; Simmonds SE; Cheng SH; Esteves S; Kane TL; Nuetzel H; Pilaud N; Rachmawati R; Barber PH
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28075039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A high-quality genetic reference database for European commercial fishes reveals substitution fraud of processed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and common sole (Solea solea) at different steps in the Belgian supply chain.
Deconinck D; Volckaert FAM; Hostens K; Panicz R; Eljasik P; Faria M; Monteiro CS; Robbens J; Derycke S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Jul; 141():111417. PubMed ID: 32437897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent Advances in Closed-Tube Barcoding for FastFish-ID.
Sanchez JA; Rice JE; Wangh LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():267-278. PubMed ID: 38683325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fish product mislabelling: failings of traceability in the production chain and implications for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
Helyar SJ; Lloyd HA; de Bruyn M; Leake J; Bennett N; Carvalho GR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98691. PubMed ID: 24921655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated DNA barcoding methods to identify species in the processed fish products from Chinese market.
Zhao S; Zhang H; Zhao Z; Zhang Y; Yu J; Tang Y; Zhou C
Food Res Int; 2024 Apr; 182():114140. PubMed ID: 38519172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A glimpse into the genetic diversity of the Peruvian seafood sector: Unveiling species substitution, mislabeling and trade of threatened species.
Marín A; Serna J; Robles C; Ramírez B; Reyes-Flores LE; Zelada-Mázmela E; Sotil G; Alfaro R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206596. PubMed ID: 30444869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seafood traceability: current needs, available tools, and biotechnological challenges for origin certification.
Leal MC; Pimentel T; Ricardo F; Rosa R; Calado R
Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 25865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
