264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34301928)
81. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication.
Olm MR; Brown CT; Brooks B; Banfield JF
ISME J; 2017 Dec; 11(12):2864-2868. PubMed ID: 28742071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life.
Parks DH; Rinke C; Chuvochina M; Chaumeil PA; Woodcroft BJ; Evans PN; Hugenholtz P; Tyson GW
Nat Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 2(11):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 28894102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Metagenomes Binning Using Proximity-Ligation Data.
Marbouty M; Koszul R
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2301():163-181. PubMed ID: 34415535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Resolving the Complexity of Human Skin Metagenomes Using Single-Molecule Sequencing.
Tsai YC; Conlan S; Deming C; ; Segre JA; Kong HH; Korlach J; Oh J
mBio; 2016 Feb; 7(1):e01948-15. PubMed ID: 26861018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. A new metagenome binning method based on gene uniqueness.
Kang Y; Wan C; Lu S; Fu Z; Chen AK; Lu Z
Genes Genomics; 2020 Aug; 42(8):883-892. PubMed ID: 32506266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Strain profiling and epidemiology of bacterial species from metagenomic sequencing.
Albanese D; Donati C
Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):2260. PubMed ID: 29273717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. High-resolution microbiome analysis enabled by linking of 16S rRNA gene sequences with adjacent genomic contexts.
Kapustina Ž; Medžiūnė J; Alzbutas G; Rokaitis I; Matjošaitis K; Mackevičius G; Žeimytė S; Karpus L; Lubys A
Microb Genom; 2021 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 34473015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing.
Moss EL; Maghini DG; Bhatt AS
Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):701-707. PubMed ID: 32042169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Elviz - exploration of metagenome assemblies with an interactive visualization tool.
Cantor M; Nordberg H; Smirnova T; Hess M; Tringe S; Dubchak I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 25928663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Accurate taxonomic assignment of short pyrosequencing reads.
Clemente JC; Jansson J; Valiente G
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 19908352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes.
Alneberg J; Karlsson CMG; Divne AM; Bergin C; Homa F; Lindh MV; Hugerth LW; Ettema TJG; Bertilsson S; Andersson AF; Pinhassi J
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):173. PubMed ID: 30266101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Application and Challenge of 3rd Generation Sequencing for Clinical Bacterial Studies.
Ben Khedher M; Ghedira K; Rolain JM; Ruimy R; Croce O
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35163319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Optimizing
Roux S; Trubl G; Goudeau D; Nath N; Couradeau E; Ahlgren NA; Zhan Y; Marsan D; Chen F; Fuhrman JA; Northen TR; Sullivan MB; Rich VI; Malmstrom RR; Eloe-Fadrosh EA
PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6902. PubMed ID: 31119088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes.
Franzosa EA; McIver LJ; Rahnavard G; Thompson LR; Schirmer M; Weingart G; Lipson KS; Knight R; Caporaso JG; Segata N; Huttenhower C
Nat Methods; 2018 Nov; 15(11):962-968. PubMed ID: 30377376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
Jo J; Oh J; Park C
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota.
Almeida A; Mitchell AL; Boland M; Forster SC; Gloor GB; Tarkowska A; Lawley TD; Finn RD
Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7753):499-504. PubMed ID: 30745586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. MetaMLST: multi-locus strain-level bacterial typing from metagenomic samples.
Zolfo M; Tett A; Jousson O; Donati C; Segata N
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jan; 45(2):e7. PubMed ID: 27651451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. 1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses.
Zou Y; Xue W; Luo G; Deng Z; Qin P; Guo R; Sun H; Xia Y; Liang S; Dai Y; Wan D; Jiang R; Su L; Feng Q; Jie Z; Guo T; Xia Z; Liu C; Yu J; Lin Y; Tang S; Huo G; Xu X; Hou Y; Liu X; Wang J; Yang H; Kristiansen K; Li J; Jia H; Xiao L
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 30718868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Development of a Single Locus Sequence Typing (SLST) Scheme for Typing Bacterial Species Directly from Complex Communities.
Scholz CF; Jensen A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1535():97-107. PubMed ID: 27914075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
