These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3430372)

  • 1. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC; Schwander TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.
    Moore BC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech intelligibility considerations in specifying characteristics of a programmable hearing aid.
    Pavlovic CV
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():181-9. PubMed ID: 2356725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid.
    Weiss M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids.
    Williamson MJ; Cummins KL; Hecox KE
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a general measure of distortion.
    Levitt H; Cudahy E; Hwang WH; Kennedy E; Link C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 3430387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory filtering and the discrimination of spectral shapes by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Holte LA; Relkin E
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 3430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of adaptive multimicrophone algorithms for hearing aids.
    Chazan D; Medan Y; Shvadron U
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 3430370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-state compression of spectral tilt: individual differences and psychoacoustical limitations to the benefit from compression.
    Haggard MP; Trinder JR; Foster JR; Lindblad AC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):193-206. PubMed ID: 3430377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectrum shaping with a hardware digital filter.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; Matesich JS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):21-8. PubMed ID: 3430379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Cord MT
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.