These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3430377)

  • 1. Two-state compression of spectral tilt: individual differences and psychoacoustical limitations to the benefit from compression.
    Haggard MP; Trinder JR; Foster JR; Lindblad AC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):193-206. PubMed ID: 3430377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bustamante DK; Braida LD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):149-60. PubMed ID: 3430374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.
    Moore BC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory filtering and the discrimination of spectral shapes by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Holte LA; Relkin E
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 3430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids.
    Williamson MJ; Cummins KL; Hecox KE
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sensible application of modern hearing aids--technic, uses and limitations].
    Steffens T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Nov; 83(11):754-6. PubMed ID: 15538666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A microprocessor-based acoustic hearing aid for the profoundly impaired listener.
    Rosen S; Walliker JR; Fourcin A; Ball V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):239-60. PubMed ID: 3430383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC; Schwander TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of bandwidth compression hearing aids applied to the voiced portion of speech.
    Knorr SG
    J Bioeng; 1978 Apr; 2(1-2):47-57. PubMed ID: 681320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards a general measure of distortion.
    Levitt H; Cudahy E; Hwang WH; Kennedy E; Link C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 3430387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.