BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34304307)

  • 1. The MLE of the uniform distribution with right-censored data.
    Yu Q
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Oct; 27(4):662-678. PubMed ID: 34304307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perturbative method for maximum likelihood estimation of the Weibull distribution parameters.
    Coria VH; Maximov S; Rivas-Dávalos F; Melchor-Hernández CL
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1802. PubMed ID: 27812442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A consistent NPMLE of the joint distribution function with competing risks data under the dependent masking and right-censoring model.
    Li J; Yu Q
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Jan; 22(1):63-99. PubMed ID: 25160694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonparametric estimation of multivariate scale mixtures of uniform densities.
    Pavlides MG; Wellner JA
    J Multivar Anal; 2012 May; 107():71-89. PubMed ID: 22485055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistency of the MLE for the Joint Distribution of Interval-Censored Survival Times and Continuous Marks.
    Maathuis MH; Wellner JA
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2008 Mar; 35(1):83-103. PubMed ID: 19881895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
    Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
    Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A nonparametric estimator of survival functions for arbitrarily truncated and censored data.
    Pan W; Chappell R
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1998; 4(2):187-202. PubMed ID: 9658775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical Techniques to Analyze Pesticide Data Program Food Residue Observations.
    Szarka AZ; Hayworth CG; Ramanarayanan TS; Joseph RSI
    J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Jul; 66(27):7165-7171. PubMed ID: 29902006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Tool for Microbial Quantification in Food From Left-Censored Data Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Bahk GJ; Lee HJ
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():730733. PubMed ID: 35002994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
    Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid report on estimating incidence from cross-sectional data.
    DeMonte JB; Neilan AM; Loop MS; Ciaranello AL; Hudgens MG
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 53():106-108.e1. PubMed ID: 32979470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-Making for the Lifetime Performance Index.
    Alsaedi BSO; Abd El-Raouf MM; Hafez EH; Almaspoor Z; Alamri OA; Alanazi KA; Khosa SK
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():3005067. PubMed ID: 34335712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferences concerning exponential distributions in the presence of randomly right censored data with missing censored values.
    Singh B
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2002 Mar; 8(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 11878226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust Wald-type tests under random censoring.
    Ghosh A; Basu A; Pardo L
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1285-1305. PubMed ID: 33372282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.