These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34304625)

  • 1. A review of history of CAD/CAM system application in the production of transtibial prosthetic socket in developing countries (from 1980 to 2019).
    Afiqah Hamzah N; Razak NAA; Sayuti Ab Karim M; Gholizadeh H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1359-1374. PubMed ID: 34304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
    Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sockets Manufactured by CAD/CAM Method Have Positive Effects on the Quality of Life of Patients With Transtibial Amputation.
    Karakoç M; Batmaz İ; Sariyildiz MA; Yazmalar L; Aydin A; Em S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Aug; 96(8):578-581. PubMed ID: 28085736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in prosthetics.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Jul; (256):39-43. PubMed ID: 2364620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital healthcare technologies: Modern tools to transform prosthetic care.
    Cabrera IA; Pike TC; McKittrick JM; Meyers MA; Rao RR; Lin AY
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(sup1):129-144. PubMed ID: 34644232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: how accurate are they?
    Sanders JE; Rogers EL; Sorenson EA; Lee GS; Abrahamson DC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 18247236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength testing of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic socket.
    van der Stelt M; Verhamme L; Slump CH; Brouwers L; Maal TJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Mar; 236(3):367-375. PubMed ID: 34852701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated fabrication of mobility aids (AFMA): below-knee CASD/CAM testing and evaluation program results.
    Houston VL; Burgess EM; Childress DS; Lehneis HR; Mason CP; Garbarini MA; LaBlanc KP; Boone DA; Chan RB; Harlan JH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(4):78-124. PubMed ID: 1432729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
    Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer automated design and computer automated manufacture.
    Brncick M
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):701-13. PubMed ID: 10989487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics--current clinical models and a view to the future.
    Smith DG; Burgess EM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11440264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
    Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
    Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of a rapid prototyping prosthetic socket coated with a resin layer for transtibial amputees.
    Hsu LH; Huang GF; Lu CT; Hong DY; Liu SH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19947824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical simulation and experimental testing for static failure prediction in additively manufactured below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Karthik Rajashekar K; Regalla SP; Suresh K; Shrivastava PN
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Feb; 238(2):257-268. PubMed ID: 38214296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.
    Köhler P; Lindh L; Netz P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2717380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.