157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34305085)
1. Measuring peri-implant bone lesions using low-dose cone-beam computed tomography.
Leisner LC; Tasaka A; Trebing CT; Hilgenfeld T; Kosinski MA; Kronsteiner D; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):326-332. PubMed ID: 34305085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study.
Horsch L; Labis C; Trebing CT; Kronsteiner D; Hilgenfeld T; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103744. PubMed ID: 34252488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.
Miotk N; Schwindling FS; Zidan M; Juerchott A; Rammelsberg P; Hosseini Z; Nittka M; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104422. PubMed ID: 36649822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging furcation defects with low-dose cone beam computed tomography.
Ruetters M; Gehrig H; Kim TS; Bartha V; Bruckner T; Schwindling FS; Felten A; Lux C; Sen S
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6824. PubMed ID: 35474083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-dose CBCT imaging of alveolar buccal bone adjacent to mandibular anterior teeth- a pilot study.
Ruetters M; Gehrig H; Kronsteiner D; Doll S; Kim TS; Lux CJ; Sen S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4173-4182. PubMed ID: 35103838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex-vivo imaging of buccal and oral periodontal bone with low-dose CBCT in porcine jaws.
Ruetters M; Gehrig H; Kronsteiner D; Weyer V; Kim TS; Lux CJ; Sen S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Jan; 51(1):20210233. PubMed ID: 34233504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques - a human cadaver study.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Zitzmann NU; Filippi A; Payer M; Dagassan-Berndt D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 26059443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of acquisition volume on cone beam computed tomography imaging of marginal bone: an ex vivo study.
Ruetters M; Alexandrou K; Gehrig H; Awounvo S; Kim TS; Felten A; Lux C; Sen S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Apr; 83():204-209. PubMed ID: 38661245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: a systematic review.
Jacobs R; Vranckx M; Vanderstuyft T; Quirynen M; Salmon B
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11 Suppl 1():77-92. PubMed ID: 30109301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misfit detection in implant-supported prostheses of different compositions by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Araujo-Siqueira C; Carneiro VC; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 32723499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
