These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34305250)

  • 1. Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies.
    Zhou TJ; Raza S; Nelson KP
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(10):1861-1881. PubMed ID: 34305250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3272-3287. PubMed ID: 31099902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Zhou TJ; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 32529683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consistency of experts' evaluation of obstetric claims for compensation.
    Andreasen S; Backe B; Lydersen S; Øvrebø K; Øian P
    BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):948-53. PubMed ID: 25155624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.
    Kim C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):4014-4033. PubMed ID: 33969509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expert assessment of historical crop specific pesticide use in the Netherlands.
    Brouwer M; Huss A; Vermeulen R; Nijssen P; de Snoo G; Kromhout H
    Occup Environ Med; 2014 Oct; 71(10):717-22. PubMed ID: 25085766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of physician examiners', standardized patients', and communication experts' ratings of international medical graduates' English proficiency.
    Rothman AI; Cusimano M
    Acad Med; 2000 Dec; 75(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 11112723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's features and inter-/intra-rater agreement on mammographic density assessment in full-field digital mammograms (DDM-SPAIN).
    Pérez-Gómez B; Ruiz F; Martínez I; Casals M; Miranda J; Sánchez-Contador C; Vidal C; Llobet R; Pollán M; Salas D
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 132(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 22042363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
    Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of health information on the Internet: an examination of experts' ratings.
    Craigie M; Loader B; Burrows R; Muncer S
    J Med Internet Res; 2002; 4(1):e2. PubMed ID: 11956034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing method agreement for paired repeated binary measurements administered by multiple raters.
    Wang W; Lin N; Oberhaus JD; Avidan MS
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(3):279-293. PubMed ID: 31788847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Classification Consistency of Oral Lesion Images for Use in an Image Classification Teaching Tool.
    Shen Y; Yoon MN; Ortiz S; Friesen R; Lai H
    Dent J (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34436006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple-rater kappas for binary data: Models and interpretation.
    Stoyan D; Pommerening A; Hummel M; Kopp-Schneider A
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):381-394. PubMed ID: 29280179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):812-831. PubMed ID: 27184590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.