These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34305727)

  • 1. Racing Clean in a Tainted World: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences and Views of Clean British Elite Distance Runners on Doping and Anti-Doping.
    Shelley J; Thrower SN; Petróczi A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():673087. PubMed ID: 34305727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of the performance-enhancing drugs.
    Negro F; Di Trana A; Marinelli S
    Acta Biomed; 2022 Jan; 92(6):e2021401. PubMed ID: 35075058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.
    Morente-Sánchez J; Zabala M
    Sports Med; 2013 Jun; 43(6):395-411. PubMed ID: 23532595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes.
    Bloodworth A; McNamee M
    Int J Drug Policy; 2010 Jul; 21(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 20056401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context matters: athletes' perception of dopers' values, actions and vulnerabilities.
    Veltmaat A; Dreiskämper D; Brueckner S; Bondarev D; Heyes A; Barkoukis V; Elbe AM; Lazuras L; De Maria A; Zelli A; Petróczi A
    Front Sports Act Living; 2023; 5():1229679. PubMed ID: 38162700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doping in Paralympic sport: perceptions, responsibility and anti-doping education experiences from the perspective of Paralympic athletes and parasport coaches.
    Blank C; Weber K; Boardley ID; Abel T; Schobersberger W; Patterson LB
    Front Sports Act Living; 2023; 5():1166139. PubMed ID: 37483282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Doing What Is Right and Doing It Right": A Mapping Review of Athletes' Perception of Anti-Doping Legitimacy.
    Woolway T; Lazuras L; Barkoukis V; Petróczi A
    Int J Drug Policy; 2020 Oct; 84():102865. PubMed ID: 32738700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency and type of adverse analytical findings in athletics: Differences among disciplines.
    Aguilar-Navarro M; Salinero JJ; Muñoz-Guerra J; Plata MDM; Del Coso J
    Drug Test Anal; 2021 Aug; 13(8):1561-1568. PubMed ID: 33982423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE IT-A Literacy-Based Assessment Tool for
    Blank C; Gatterer K; Overbye M; Schobersberger W; Streicher B; Petróczi A
    Front Sports Act Living; 2022; 4():842192. PubMed ID: 35368413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods.
    de Hon O; Kuipers H; van Bottenburg M
    Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 45(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 25169441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting doping in sport: national level athletes' perceptions of their role in doping prevention.
    Whitaker L; Backhouse SH; Long J
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2014 Dec; 24(6):e515-521. PubMed ID: 24673128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport.
    Petróczi A; Backhouse SH; Barkoukis V; Brand R; Elbe AM; Lazuras L; Lucidi F
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 26094122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Clean athlete status' cannot be certified: Calling for caution, evidence and transparency in 'alternative' anti-doping systems.
    Petróczi A; Backhouse SH; Boardley ID; Saugy M; Pitsiladis Y; Viret M; Ioannidis G; Ohl F; Loland S; McNamee M
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jul; 93():103030. PubMed ID: 33250439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recreational Athletes' Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances: Results from the First European Randomized Response Technique Survey.
    Christiansen AV; Frenger M; Chirico A; Pitsch W
    Sports Med Open; 2023 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 36617340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers and enablers in doping, anti-doping, and clean sport: A qualitative meta-synthesis informed by the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model.
    Williams TL; Patterson LB; Heyes AR; Staff HR; Boardley ID; Petróczi A; Backhouse SH
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2024 May; 72():102608. PubMed ID: 38360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An (un)desirable trade of harms? How elite athletes might react to medically supervised 'doping' and their considerations of side-effects in this situation.
    Overbye M
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 May; 55():14-30. PubMed ID: 29477956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation.
    Wippert PM; Fließer M
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2016 Oct; 11(1):35. PubMed ID: 27724975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can We Better Integrate the Role of Anti-Doping in Sports and Society? A Psychological Approach to Contemporary Value-Based Prevention.
    Petróczi A; Norman P; Brueckner S
    Med Sport Sci; 2017; 62():160-176. PubMed ID: 28571017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.