144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34306362)
1. The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.
Guo S; Wang H; Yu X; Yu Y; Wang C
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(6):6229-6235. PubMed ID: 34306362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application and comparative analysis of 3.0T MRI and ultrasound in diagnosing CSP after caesarean section.
Yang D; Zhang Z; Kang Z; Liu Y
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(4):3806-3810. PubMed ID: 34017569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic value of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for early cesarean scar pregnancy].
Liu Q; Zhang R; Wang X; Liu K; Bai G; Huang Y; Zhu H; Yan Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 94(45):3589-92. PubMed ID: 25622841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound.
Cheng XL; Cao XY; Wang XQ; Lin HL; Fang JC; Wang L
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):547-553. PubMed ID: 35097080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1890-3. PubMed ID: 25056467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.
Li H; Liu X; Xie L; Ye Z; Gan L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():117-122. PubMed ID: 32007793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound combined with color Doppler ultrasound for early cesarean scar pregnancy.
Shi L; Huang L; Liu L; Yang X; Yao D; Chen D; Xiong J; Duan J
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Oct; 10(10):10486-10494. PubMed ID: 34763495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Wang K; Jing F
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9714369. PubMed ID: 35126959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Xiong X; Yan P; Gao C; Sun Q; Xu F
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4762785. PubMed ID: 27340659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla preoperative MRI of the wrist in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain.
Anderson ML; Skinner JA; Felmlee JP; Berger RA; Amrami KK
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 33(7):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18762112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Jiao LZ; Zhao J; Wan XR; Liu XY; Feng FZ; Ren T; Xiang Y
Chin Med Sci J; 2008 Mar; 23(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18437903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: A meta-analysis.
Xiao X; Ding R; Peng L; Liu H; Zhu Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(48):e27532. PubMed ID: 35049166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of scar pregnancy.
Huang Z; Liu J; Jing Z; Lin L; Li X
Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1743-1747. PubMed ID: 36246696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitfalls in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Ravi Selvaraj L; Rose N; Ramachandran M
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2018 Jun; 68(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 29895994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in evaluating cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.
Wu R; Klein MA; Mahboob S; Gupta M; Katz DS
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2013; 3():16. PubMed ID: 23814688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancies: a single-center experience and literature review.
Al-Jaroudi D; Aboudi S; Baradwan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 May; 303(5):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 33048187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Liu D; Yang M; Wu Q
Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Nov; 486():291-297. PubMed ID: 30102898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
