These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34307433)

  • 1. Approaches for Health Effect Characterization in Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods: A Comparative Case Study.
    Thomsen ST; Nauta M; Jakobsen LS; Jakobsen MU; Mejborn H; Outzen M; Poulsen M; Ravn-Haren G; Andersen R
    Front Nutr; 2021; 8():607929. PubMed ID: 34307433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A probabilistic approach for risk-benefit assessment of food substitutions: A case study on substituting meat by fish.
    Thomsen ST; de Boer W; Pires SM; Devleesschauwer B; Fagt S; Andersen R; Poulsen M; van der Voet H
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Apr; 126():79-96. PubMed ID: 30742863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk-Benefit assessment of foods: Development of a methodological framework for the harmonized selection of nutritional, microbiological, and toxicological components.
    Boué G; Ververis E; Niforou A; Federighi M; Pires SM; Poulsen M; Thomsen ST; Naska A
    Front Nutr; 2022; 9():951369. PubMed ID: 36386902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk Benefit Assessment of foods: Key findings from an international workshop.
    Pires SM; Boué G; Boobis A; Eneroth H; Hoekstra J; Membré JM; Persson IM; Poulsen M; Ruzante J; van Klaveren J; Thomsen ST; Nauta MJ
    Food Res Int; 2019 Feb; 116():859-869. PubMed ID: 30717016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The health impact of substituting unprocessed red meat by pulses in the Danish diet.
    Fabricius FA; Thomsen ST; Fagt S; Nauta M
    Eur J Nutr; 2021 Sep; 60(6):3107-3118. PubMed ID: 33515322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes.
    Pfinder M; Heise TL; Hilton Boon M; Pega F; Fenton C; Griebler U; Gartlehner G; Sommer I; Katikireddi SV; Lhachimi SK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012333. PubMed ID: 32270494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communicating Food Risk-Benefit Assessments: Edible Insects as Red Meat Replacers.
    Boehm E; Borzekowski D; Ververis E; Lohmann M; Böl GF
    Front Nutr; 2021; 8():749696. PubMed ID: 34977112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods.
    ; Assunção R; Pires SM; Nauta M
    EFSA J; 2019 Sep; 17(Suppl 2):e170917. PubMed ID: 32626475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the risk-benefit balance of substituting red and processed meat with fish in a Danish diet.
    Thomsen ST; Pires SM; Devleesschauwer B; Poulsen M; Fagt S; Ygil KH; Andersen R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Oct; 120():50-63. PubMed ID: 29969673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Red meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease among US men: prospective cohort study.
    Al-Shaar L; Satija A; Wang DD; Rimm EB; Smith-Warner SA; Stampfer MJ; Hu FB; Willett WC
    BMJ; 2020 Dec; 371():m4141. PubMed ID: 33268459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.