These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34307936)

  • 1. A new approach to expert reviewer detection and product rating derivation from online experiential product reviews.
    Sarkar AR; Ahmad S
    Heliyon; 2021 Jul; 7(7):e07409. PubMed ID: 34307936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting fake-review buyers using network structure: Direct evidence from Amazon.
    He S; Hollenbeck B; Overgoor G; Proserpio D; Tosyali A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Nov; 119(47):e2211932119. PubMed ID: 36378645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which Receives More Attention, Online Review Sentiment or Online Review Rating? Spillover Effect Analysis from JD.com.
    Shan S; Yang Y; Li C
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 39336038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
    Callaham ML; Baxt WG; Waeckerle JF; Wears RL
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 9676664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating valence versus rating distribution: perceived helpfulness of word of mouth in e-commerce.
    Kato T
    SN Bus Econ; 2022; 2(11):162. PubMed ID: 36213378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testosterone Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Testosterone Boosting Supplements.
    Balasubramanian A; Thirumavalavan N; Srivatsav A; Yu J; Lipshultz LI; Pastuszak AW
    J Sex Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 30770069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Matter of Reevaluation: Incentivizing Users to Contribute Reviews in Online Platforms.
    Zhang M; Wei X; Zeng DD
    Decis Support Syst; 2020 Jan; 128():. PubMed ID: 31920212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
    Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
    Strayhorn J; McDermott JF; Tanguay P
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Jun; 150(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 8494074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistics-Based Outlier Detection and Correction Method for Amazon Customer Reviews.
    Chatterjee I; Zhou M; Abusorrah A; Sedraoui K; Alabdulwahab A
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Dec; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34945950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A semiautomated risk assessment method for consumer products.
    Zaman N; Goldberg DM; Gruss RJ; Abrahams AS
    Risk Anal; 2024 Mar; 44(3):705-723. PubMed ID: 37337464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Reviewers' Creditworthiness on Consumers' Purchase Intention in Edge Path: Implications for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
    Limei C; Wei L
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():619263. PubMed ID: 33363100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversifying customer review rankings.
    Krestel R; Dokoohaki N
    Neural Netw; 2015 Jun; 66():36-45. PubMed ID: 25795511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining Review Text Content and Reviewer-Item Rating Matrix to Predict Review Rating.
    Wang B; Huang Y; Li X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():5968705. PubMed ID: 26880879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When Similarity Beats Expertise-Differential Effects of Patient and Expert Ratings on Physician Choice: Field and Experimental Study.
    Kranzbühler AM; Kleijnen MHP; Verlegh PWJ; Teerling M
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jun; 21(6):e12454. PubMed ID: 31244481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Tzeng GH
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():68-82. PubMed ID: 28750913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.