These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34308607)

  • 21. Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.
    Ahmed K; Ibrahim A; Wang TT; Khan N; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
    BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(10):1544-56. PubMed ID: 22443296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.
    Schreuder HW; Wolswijk R; Zweemer RP; Schijven MP; Verheijen RH
    BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 21981104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Training in urological robotic surgery. Future perspectives.
    El Sherbiny A; Eissa A; Ghaith A; Morini E; Marzotta L; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 29336338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Robotic surgery in Urology : New kids on the block].
    Gözen A; Rassweiler J
    Urologe A; 2020 Sep; 59(9):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 32785733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotics in urological surgery: evolution, current status and future perspectives.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Barret E; Mombet A; Cathala N; Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Sep; 39(7):435-41. PubMed ID: 25801676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training.
    Azadi S; Green IC; Arnold A; Truong M; Potts J; Martino MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):490-495. PubMed ID: 33310145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Revolutionizing urology: the advancements and applications of robotic platforms.
    Adhikari K; Penmetsa GK; Krishnappa D; Taori R; Raghunath SK
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):106. PubMed ID: 38436766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Novel Robotic Platforms for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Narrative Review.
    Kallidonis P; Gkeka K; Tatanis V; Katsakiori P; Vrettos T; Liatsikos E
    J Endourol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38753723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.
    Jiménez-Rodríguez RM; Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares M; Díaz-Pavón JM; Reyes-Díaz ML; Vazquez-Monchul JM; Garcia-Cabrera AM; Padillo J; De la Portilla F
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1807-1815. PubMed ID: 27714517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.
    Araujo SE; Seid VE; Klajner S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14359-70. PubMed ID: 25339823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2806-2820. PubMed ID: 34318575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Robotically assisted urologic endoscopic surgery].
    Castillo O; Javier Ahualli C; Sánchez-Salas R; Vidal I; Campos R; Feria-Flores M; Sepúlveda F
    Arch Esp Urol; 2008 Sep; 61(7):809-14. PubMed ID: 18972916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.
    Autorino R; Kaouk JH; Stolzenburg JU; Gill IS; Mottrie A; Tewari A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):266-80. PubMed ID: 22940173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience.
    Badani KK; Hemal AK; Peabody JO; Menon M
    World J Urol; 2006 Jun; 24(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 16607549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology.
    Autorino R; Zargar H; Kaouk JH
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):939-49. PubMed ID: 24993800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic Surgery as Applied to Functional and Reconstructive Urology.
    Osman NI; Mangir N; Mironska E; Chapple CR
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 31281090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ROBOTIC SURGERY: BIOETHICAL ASPECTS.
    Siqueira-Batista R; Souza CR; Maia PM; Siqueira SL
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2016; 29(4):287-290. PubMed ID: 28076489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nomenclature of robotic procedures in urology.
    Castle EP; Lee D;
    J Endourol; 2008 Jul; 22(7):1467-70. PubMed ID: 18613788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consulting 'Dr. Google' for minimally invasive urological oncological surgeries: A contemporary web-based trend analysis.
    Cacciamani GE; Sebben M; Tafuri A; Nassiri N; Cocci A; Russo GI; Hung A; de Castro Abreu AL; Gill IS; Artibani W
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2250. PubMed ID: 33667326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evolution of open versus laparoscopic/robotic surgery: 10 years of changes in urology].
    Peña González JA; Pascual Queralt M; Salvador Bayarri JT; Rosales Bordes A; Palou Redorta J; Villavicencio Mavrich H
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Mar; 34(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 20416238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.