186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34309243)
21. Evaluation of peer-generated MCQs to assess and support learning in a problem-based learning programme.
Botelho MG; Lam O; Watt RM; Leung D; Kember D
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 29266581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Simple and Sustainable Exercise to Enhance Student Self-Reflection on Error-Making, Focus Support, and Guide Curricular Design.
Binks AP; Mutcheson RB; Holt EM; LeClair RJ
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 35193438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study.
Bouwmeester RA; de Kleijn RA; van Rijen HV
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16():200. PubMed ID: 27506461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
Luetsch K; Burrows J
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mapping session learning objectives to exam questions: How to do it and how to apply the results.
Jalloh C; Collins B; Lafleur D; Reimer J; Morrow A
Med Teach; 2020 Jan; 42(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 31433256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.
Alamoudi AA; Al Shawwa LA; Gad H; Tekian A
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2021 Jul; 49(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 33729707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.
Wagener S; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Gornostayeva M; Schultz JH; Brüstle P; Mohr D; Vander Beken A; Better J; Fries M; Gottschalk M; Günther J; Herrmann L; Kreisel C; Moczko T; Illg C; Jassowicz A; Müller A; Niesert M; Strübing F; Jünger J
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc46. PubMed ID: 26483859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.
Jaap A; Dewar A; Duncan C; Fairhurst K; Hope D; Kluth D
BMC Med Educ; 2021 Feb; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 33530962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Multi-institutional Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of the Implementation of Constructed Response Exam Questions.
Olvet DM; Bird JB; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Papp KK; Qua K; Willey JM; Brenner JM
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(5):609-622. PubMed ID: 35989668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.
Mostyn A; Meade O; Lymn JS
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Nov; 12():113. PubMed ID: 23148762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States.
Nagoshi K; Zaidi Z; Wright A; Stalvey C
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():29. PubMed ID: 31614406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
Mitra NK; Barua A
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.
Gillingham K; Eggleton K; Goodyear-Smith F
Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):434-441. PubMed ID: 32174178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.
Bird JB; Olvet DM; Willey JM; Brenner J
Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1649959. PubMed ID: 31438809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing a traditional case-based application exercise and a student question creation exercise on student performance and perceptions.
Tatachar A; Kominski C
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Jul; 9(4):689-697. PubMed ID: 29233444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The assessment of a structured online formative assessment program: a randomised controlled trial.
Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2014 Jan; 14():8. PubMed ID: 24400883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
