227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34309334)
21. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4311-4323. PubMed ID: 38348927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of activity, scan duration and patient's body mass index in the optimization of FDG imaging protocols on a TOF-PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Al-Maymani N; Oldani A; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Carriero A
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Apr; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 33825058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26.
Svirydenka H; Muehlematter UJ; Nagel HW; Delso G; Ferraro DA; Kudura K; Burger IA; Ter Voert EEGW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3188-3197. PubMed ID: 32060711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of
Yang FJ; Ai SY; Wu R; Lv Y; Xie HF; Dong Y; Meng QL; Wang F
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201356. PubMed ID: 33571001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Silicon-photomultiplier-based PET/CT reduces the minimum detectable activity of iodine-124.
Kersting D; Jentzen W; Fragoso Costa P; Sraieb M; Sandach P; Umutlu L; Conti M; Zarrad F; Rischpler C; Fendler WP; Herrmann K; Weber M
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17477. PubMed ID: 34471170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The quantification of PET-CT radiotracers to determine minimal scan time using quadratic formulation.
Said MA; Musarudin M; Zulkaffli NF
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):884-891. PubMed ID: 33141408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
Lu S; Zhang P; Li C; Sun J; Liu W; Zhang P
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34749660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of
Alqahtani MM; Willowson KP; Constable C; Fulton R; Kench PL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13528. PubMed ID: 35049129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of injected
Wielaard J; Habraken JBA; Brinks P; Lavalaye J; Boellaard R
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Apr; 7(1):20. PubMed ID: 32297142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium-68 positron range correction.
Gavriilidis P; Koole M; Marinus A; Jansen FP; Deller TW; Mottaghy FM; Wierts R
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38889361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
