These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Yesterday's Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence-and Why It Matters. Sparrow R Am J Bioeth; 2019 Jul; 19(7):6-15. PubMed ID: 31237503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modernity and postmodernity in the genesis of transhumanism-posthumanism. Pastor LM; García Cuadrado JÁ Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):335-50. PubMed ID: 25684375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping the CRISPR Gene-Editing Debate: Questions About Enhancement and Germline Modification. Johnston J Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(1):141-154. PubMed ID: 32063593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thinking through critical posthumanism: Nursing as political and affirmative becoming. Laurin AC; Martin P Nurs Inq; 2024 Jan; 31(1):e12606. PubMed ID: 37794820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome Editing: Learning from Its Past and Envisioning Its Future. Sandor J Eur J Health Law; 2022 Apr; 29(3-5):341-358. PubMed ID: 37582545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moving Beyond 'Therapy' and 'Enhancement' in the Ethics of Gene Editing. Cwik B Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Oct; 28(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 31526421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ethics of creating genetically modified children using genome editing. Ishii T Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2017 Dec; 24(6):418-423. PubMed ID: 28885275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Genetic edition and theological ethics]. Borgoño Barros C Cuad Bioet; 2019; 30(100):289-302. PubMed ID: 31618591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatise on the influence of theism, transhumanism, and posthumanism on nursing and rehabilitation healthcare practice. Tanioka R; Betriana F; Locsin RC Nurs Philos; 2021 Jul; 22(3):e12350. PubMed ID: 33735494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships. Rehmann-Sutter C New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human germline editing: a historical perspective. Morange M Hist Philos Life Sci; 2017 Oct; 39(4):34. PubMed ID: 29038945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why human germline genome editing is incompatible with equality in an inclusive society. MacKellar C New Bioeth; 2021 Mar; 27(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 33459206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The crispr / cas9 techniques applied to human genetic enhancement: a biotechnological, anthropological-philosophical and legal dialogue]. Santa María D Angelo R; Quiceno Osorio JD; Torres Flor A; Perochena Escalante AC Cuad Bioet; 2020; 31(103):343-355. PubMed ID: 33375801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Gene Editing Tools, Like CRISPR/Cas9, on the Public Health Response to Disease Outbreaks. Pope SM Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2017 Apr; 11(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27640728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. We Must Not Avoid Germline Gene Editing to Preserve Social Values: A Response to Saha et al. de Miguel Beriain I Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1205-1206. PubMed ID: 30104011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome Editing 2020: Ethics and Human Rights in Germline Editing in Humans and Gene Drives in Mosquitoes. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 2020 May; 46(2-3):143-165. PubMed ID: 32659189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]