415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34310082)
1. 3D Bioprinted Multicellular Vascular Models.
Gold KA; Saha B; Rajeeva Pandian NK; Walther BK; Palma JA; Jo J; Cooke JP; Jain A; Gaharwar AK
Adv Healthc Mater; 2021 Nov; 10(21):e2101141. PubMed ID: 34310082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue.
Chimene D; Miller L; Cross LM; Jaiswal MK; Singh I; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15976-15988. PubMed ID: 32091189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs.
Freeman S; Ramos R; Alexis Chando P; Zhou L; Reeser K; Jin S; Soman P; Ye K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():152-164. PubMed ID: 31271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.
Deo KA; Singh KA; Peak CW; Alge DL; Gaharwar AK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Mar; 26(5-6):318-338. PubMed ID: 32079490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.
Cai Y; Chang SY; Gan SW; Ma S; Lu WF; Yen CC
Acta Biomater; 2022 Oct; 151():45-69. PubMed ID: 35970479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cell encapsulation in gelatin bioink impairs 3D bioprinting resolution.
Schwartz R; Malpica M; Thompson GL; Miri AK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103524. PubMed ID: 31785543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear-Thinning and Thermo-Reversible Nanoengineered Inks for 3D Bioprinting.
Wilson SA; Cross LM; Peak CW; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Dec; 9(50):43449-43458. PubMed ID: 29214803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications.
Markstedt K; Mantas A; Tournier I; Martínez Ávila H; Hägg D; Gatenholm P
Biomacromolecules; 2015 May; 16(5):1489-96. PubMed ID: 25806996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement (NICE) Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.
Chimene D; Peak CW; Gentry JL; Carrow JK; Cross LM; Mondragon E; Cardoso GB; Kaunas R; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Mar; 10(12):9957-9968. PubMed ID: 29461795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nanoengineered Granular Hydrogel Bioinks with Preserved Interconnected Microporosity for Extrusion Bioprinting.
Ataie Z; Kheirabadi S; Zhang JW; Kedzierski A; Petrosky C; Jiang R; Vollberg C; Sheikhi A
Small; 2022 Sep; 18(37):e2202390. PubMed ID: 35922399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink.
Jia W; Gungor-Ozkerim PS; Zhang YS; Yue K; Zhu K; Liu W; Pi Q; Byambaa B; Dokmeci MR; Shin SR; Khademhosseini A
Biomaterials; 2016 Nov; 106():58-68. PubMed ID: 27552316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs.
Antich C; de Vicente J; Jiménez G; Chocarro C; Carrillo E; Montañez E; Gálvez-Martín P; Marchal JA
Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 106():114-123. PubMed ID: 32027992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ECM Based Bioink for Tissue Mimetic 3D Bioprinting.
Nam SY; Park SH
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1064():335-353. PubMed ID: 30471042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D bioprinting of molecularly engineered PEG-based hydrogels utilizing gelatin fragments.
Piluso S; Skvortsov GA; Altunbek M; Afghah F; Khani N; Koç B; Patterson J
Biofabrication; 2021 Aug; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34192670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications.
Janarthanan G; Kim JH; Kim I; Lee C; Chung EJ; Noh I
Biofabrication; 2022 May; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ECM concentration and cell-mediated traction forces play a role in vascular network assembly in 3D bioprinted tissue.
Zhang G; Varkey M; Wang Z; Xie B; Hou R; Atala A
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Apr; 117(4):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 31840798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An osteogenic bioink composed of alginate, cellulose nanofibrils, and polydopamine nanoparticles for 3D bioprinting and bone tissue engineering.
Im S; Choe G; Seok JM; Yeo SJ; Lee JH; Kim WD; Lee JY; Park SA
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Apr; 205():520-529. PubMed ID: 35217077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
