BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34310192)

  • 1. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V; Lang-Roth R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masked Speech Recognition as a Function of Masker Location for Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Anderson KM; Buss E; Rooth MA; Richter ME; Overton AB; Brown KD; Dillon MT
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 35877957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    D'Onofrio K; Richards V; Gifford R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial Release From Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    King K; Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Brown KD; Park LR
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33259722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Release From Masking in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Park LR; Dillon MT; Buss E; O'Connell BP; Brown KD
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 30(2):443-451. PubMed ID: 33769866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.
    Dirks C; Nelson PB; Sladen DP; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1293-1306. PubMed ID: 30870240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB; Liepins R; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.
    Gibbs BE; Bernstein JGW; Brungart DS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.
    Fathima H; Bhat JS; Pitchaimuthu AN
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap.
    Gartrell BC; Jones HG; Kan A; Buhr-Lawler M; Gubbels SP; Litovsky RY
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25158615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.