164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34310329)
1. Impact of the PPG Sampling Rate in the Pulse Rate Variability Indices Evaluating Several Fiducial Points in Different Pulse Waveforms.
Pelaez-Coca MD; Hernando A; Lazaro J; Gil E
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Feb; 26(2):539-549. PubMed ID: 34310329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal fiducial points for pulse rate variability analysis from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic signals.
Peralta E; Lazaro J; Bailon R; Marozas V; Gil E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Feb; 40(2):025007. PubMed ID: 30669123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of using different algorithms and fiducial points for the detection of interbeat intervals, and different sampling rates on the assessment of pulse rate variability from photoplethysmography.
Mejía-Mejía E; May JM; Kyriacou PA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 May; 218():106724. PubMed ID: 35255373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finger and forehead PPG signal comparison for respiratory rate estimation.
Hernando A; Peláez-Coca MD; Lozano MT; Lázaro J; Gil E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095007. PubMed ID: 31422948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A low-complexity PPG pulse detection method for accurate estimation of the pulse rate variability (PRV) during sudden decreases in the signal amplitude.
Argüello Prada EJ; Paredes Higinio A
Physiol Meas; 2020 Apr; 41(3):035001. PubMed ID: 32079008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the use of fractional calculus to improve the pulse arrival time (PAT) detection when using photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG) signals.
Mohammadpoor Faskhodi M; A Garcia-Gonzalez M; Fernandez-Chimeno M; Guede-Fernández F; Mateu-Mateus M; Capdevila L; J Ramos-Castro J
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0298354. PubMed ID: 38363753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of a Pulse Rate Variability Measurement Using a Smartphone Camera.
Bánhalmi A; Borbás J; Fidrich M; Bilicki V; Gingl Z; Rudas L
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():4038034. PubMed ID: 29666670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information Retrieval from Photoplethysmographic Sensors: A Comprehensive Comparison of Practical Interpolation and Breath-Extraction Techniques at Different Sampling Rates.
Reali P; Lolatto R; Coelli S; Tartaglia G; Bianchi AM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Quality of Heart Rate Variability Estimated from Wrist and Finger PPG: A Novel Approach Based on Cross-Mapping Method.
Nardelli M; Vanello N; Galperti G; Greco A; Scilingo EP
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32498403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of heart rate variability derived from finger-tip photoplethysmography as compared to electrocardiography.
Selvaraj N; Jaryal A; Santhosh J; Deepak KK; Anand S
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 18663635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filtering-induced time shifts in photoplethysmography pulse features measured at different body sites: the importance of filter definition and standardization.
Liu H; Allen J; Khalid SG; Chen F; Zheng D
Physiol Meas; 2021 Jul; 42(7):. PubMed ID: 34111855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of central hypovolemia on photoplethysmographic waveform parameters in healthy volunteers part 2: frequency domain analysis.
Alian AA; Galante NJ; Stachenfeld NS; Silverman DG; Shelley KH
J Clin Monit Comput; 2011 Dec; 25(6):387-96. PubMed ID: 22057245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoplethysmographic Waveform Versus Heart Rate Variability to Identify Low-Stress States: Attention Test.
Pelaez MDC; Albalate MTL; Sanz AH; Valles MA; Gil E
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Sep; 23(5):1940-1951. PubMed ID: 30452382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heart Rate Variability and Pulse Rate Variability: Do Anatomical Location and Sampling Rate Matter?
Burma JS; Griffiths JK; Lapointe AP; Oni IK; Soroush A; Carere J; Smirl JD; Dunn JF
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autonomic Nervous System Measurement in Hyperbaric Environments Using ECG and PPG Signals.
Hernando A; Pelaez-Coca MD; Lozano MT; Aiger M; Izquierdo D; Sanchez A; Lopez-Jurado MI; Moura I; Fidalgo J; Lazaro J; Gil E
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Jan; 23(1):132-142. PubMed ID: 29994358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of heart rate variability signal features derived from electrocardiography and photoplethysmography in healthy individuals.
Bolanos M; Nazeran H; Haltiwanger E
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4289-94. PubMed ID: 17946618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Processing Photoplethysmograms Recorded by Smartwatches to Improve the Quality of Derived Pulse Rate Variability.
Polak AG; Klich B; Saganowski S; Prucnal MA; Kazienko P
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term pulse rate variability is better characterized by functional near-infrared spectroscopy than by photoplethysmography.
Holper L; Seifritz E; Scholkmann F
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Sep; 21(9):091308. PubMed ID: 27185106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of foot finding methods for deriving instantaneous pulse rates from photoplethysmographic signals.
Hemon MC; Phillips JP
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Apr; 30(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 25902897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of time-domain indices, frequency domain measures of heart rate variability derived from ECG waveform and pulse-wave-related HRV among overweight individuals: an observational study.
Kumar SM; Vaishali K; Maiya GA; Shivashankar KN; Shashikiran U
F1000Res; 2023; 12():1229. PubMed ID: 37799491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
