These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34310412)

  • 21. How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.
    Damm SA; Sis JL; Kulkarni AM; Chatterjee M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3728-3740. PubMed ID: 31589545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.
    Drouin JR; Theodore RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):981. PubMed ID: 36050170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Recognition of Emotions in Speech.
    Christensen JA; Sis J; Kulkarni AM; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1069-1083. PubMed ID: 30614835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Talker variability in word recognition under cochlear implant simulation: Does talker gender matter?
    Tamati TN; Sijp L; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):EL370. PubMed ID: 32359292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Xin Luo ; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 18003871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Cannon SA; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):477-492. PubMed ID: 30074504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.
    van de Velde DJ; Schiller NO; van Heuven VJ; Levelt CC; van Ginkel J; Beers M; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3349. PubMed ID: 28599540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
    Lewis JH; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Talker variability effects on vocal emotion recognition in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.
    Luo X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):EL497. PubMed ID: 28040001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Xu A; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.