182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34310601)
1. A fast and robust Bayesian nonparametric method for prediction of complex traits using summary statistics.
Zhou G; Zhao H
PLoS Genet; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009697. PubMed ID: 34310601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of complex effect-size distributions using summary-level statistics from genome-wide association studies across 32 complex traits.
Zhang Y; Qi G; Park JH; Chatterjee N
Nat Genet; 2018 Sep; 50(9):1318-1326. PubMed ID: 30104760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.
Zhao Z; Yi Y; Song J; Wu Y; Zhong X; Lin Y; Hohman TJ; Fletcher J; Lu Q
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):257. PubMed ID: 34488838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A robust method to estimate regional polygenic correlation under misspecified linkage disequilibrium structure.
Paré G; Mao S; Deng WQ
Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 42(7):636-647. PubMed ID: 30156736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TIGAR: An Improved Bayesian Tool for Transcriptomic Data Imputation Enhances Gene Mapping of Complex Traits.
Nagpal S; Meng X; Epstein MP; Tsoi LC; Patrick M; Gibson G; De Jager PL; Bennett DA; Wingo AP; Wingo TS; Yang J
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Aug; 105(2):258-266. PubMed ID: 31230719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuning parameters for polygenic risk score methods using GWAS summary statistics from training data.
Jiang W; Chen L; Girgenti MJ; Zhao H
Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):24. PubMed ID: 38169469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference.
Zabad S; Gravel S; Li Y
Am J Hum Genet; 2023 May; 110(5):741-761. PubMed ID: 37030289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partitioning gene-based variance of complex traits by gene score regression.
Zhang W; Li SY; Liu T; Li Y
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237657. PubMed ID: 32817676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrasting the Genetic Architecture of 30 Complex Traits from Summary Association Data.
Shi H; Kichaev G; Pasaniuc B
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 99(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 27346688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for estimating genetic correlation between complex traits using GWAS summary statistics.
Zhang Y; Cheng Y; Jiang W; Ye Y; Lu Q; Zhao H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33497438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving polygenic risk prediction from summary statistics by an empirical Bayes approach.
So HC; Sham PC
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():41262. PubMed ID: 28145530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Widespread signatures of natural selection across human complex traits and functional genomic categories.
Zeng J; Xue A; Jiang L; Lloyd-Jones LR; Wu Y; Wang H; Zheng Z; Yengo L; Kemper KE; Goddard ME; Wray NR; Visscher PM; Yang J
Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):1164. PubMed ID: 33608517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-polygenic score approach to trait prediction.
Krapohl E; Patel H; Newhouse S; Curtis CJ; von Stumm S; Dale PS; Zabaneh D; Breen G; O'Reilly PF; Plomin R
Mol Psychiatry; 2018 May; 23(5):1368-1374. PubMed ID: 28785111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating and improving heritability models using summary statistics.
Speed D; Holmes J; Balding DJ
Nat Genet; 2020 Apr; 52(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32203469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic colocalization of genetic variants from complex and molecular traits: promise and limitations.
Hukku A; Pividori M; Luca F; Pique-Regi R; Im HK; Wen X
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 108(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 33308443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores.
Vilhjálmsson BJ; Yang J; Finucane HK; Gusev A; Lindström S; Ripke S; Genovese G; Loh PR; Bhatia G; Do R; Hayeck T; Won HH; ; Kathiresan S; Pato M; Pato C; Tamimi R; Stahl E; Zaitlen N; Pasaniuc B; Belbin G; Kenny EE; Schierup MH; De Jager P; Patsopoulos NA; McCarroll S; Daly M; Purcell S; Chasman D; Neale B; Goddard M; Visscher PM; Kraft P; Patterson N; Price AL
Am J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 97(4):576-92. PubMed ID: 26430803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SDPRX: A statistical method for cross-population prediction of complex traits.
Zhou G; Chen T; Zhao H
Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Jan; 110(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 36460009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods that use whole genome data to estimate the heritability and genetic architecture of complex traits.
Evans LM; Tahmasbi R; Vrieze SI; Abecasis GR; Das S; Gazal S; Bjelland DW; de Candia TR; ; Goddard ME; Neale BM; Yang J; Visscher PM; Keller MC
Nat Genet; 2018 May; 50(5):737-745. PubMed ID: 29700474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
