These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3431135)

  • 1. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sexual selection continuum.
    Kokko H; Brooks R; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1498):1331-40. PubMed ID: 12079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed.
    Kokko H; Mappes J
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1876-85. PubMed ID: 16261726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
    Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
    Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
    Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.