309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34313236)
1. Diagnostic performance rates of the ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS based on histopathological evidence.
Hekimsoy İ; Öztürk E; Ertan Y; Orman MN; Kavukçu G; Özgen AG; Özdemir M; Özbek SS
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jul; 27(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 34313236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy.
Koc AM; Adıbelli ZH; Erkul Z; Sahin Y; Dilek I
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109390. PubMed ID: 33181485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the efficacy of EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in risk stratification of pediatric patients with thyroid nodules.
Tuli G; Munarin J; Scollo M; Quaglino F; De Sanctis L
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1041464. PubMed ID: 36482990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Yoon HM; Hwang J; Lee JS; Jung AY; Cho YA; Baek JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7450-7463. PubMed ID: 33864505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and comparison of three newly-released Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems for cancer risk determination.
Xu T; Wu Y; Wu RX; Zhang YZ; Gu JY; Ye XH; Tang W; Xu SH; Liu C; Wu XH
Endocrine; 2019 May; 64(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 30474824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of British Thyroid Association, American College of Radiology TIRADS and Artificial Intelligence TIRADS with histological correlation: diagnostic performance for predicting thyroid malignancy and unnecessary fine needle aspiration rate.
Watkins L; O'Neill G; Young D; McArthur C
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20201444. PubMed ID: 33989038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Study of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS for Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules.
Jin Z; Pei S; Shen H; Ouyang L; Zhang L; Mo X; Chen Q; You J; Zhang S; Zhang B
Acad Radiol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):2181-2191. PubMed ID: 37230821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective comparison of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS in thyroid nodule assessment for FNA-US.
Eidt LB; Nunes de Oliveira C; Lagos YBB; Solera GLM; Izquierdo R; Meyer ELS; Mattevi VS; Golbert L
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 98(3):415-425. PubMed ID: 35864563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines.
Yucel S; Balci IG; Tomak L
Ultrasound Q; 2023 Dec; 39(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 37918114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement Between American and European Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System (TIRADS) in the Diagnosis of 473 Thyroid Nodules From a Single Center in Brazil.
Freire da Silva P; Corrêa de Araújo Arcoverde L; de Siqueira Barbosa Arcoverde L; Tenório Wanderley Fernandes Lima G; Paes de Medeiros Lima T; José do Amaral F; Bandeira F
Endocr Pract; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 34153510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic Value of American Thyroid Association Guidelines,American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System,and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Alone and Combined With BRAF
Lin Y; Luo YK; Li J; Ren XY; Wang HW
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2023 Dec; 45(6):921-928. PubMed ID: 38173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound criteria (EU-TIRADS) to identify thyroid nodule malignancy risk in adolescents. Correlation with cyto-histological findings.
Yeste Fernández D; Vega Amenabar E; Coma Muñoz A; Arciniegas Vallejo L; Clemente León M; Planes-Conangla M; Iglesias Felip C; Sábado Álvarez C; Guillén Burrieza G; Campos-Martorell A
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed); 2021 Dec; 68(10):728-734. PubMed ID: 34924161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsy rates under four ultrasound risk stratification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Suh CH; Baek JH; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Lee JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2877-2885. PubMed ID: 33057762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of diagnostic performance and FNA management of the ACR-TIRADS and Chinese-TIRADS based on surgical histological evidence.
Dong W; Wu Y; Cai T; Wang X
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1711-1722. PubMed ID: 36915304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline.
Zhu H; Yang Y; Wu S; Chen K; Luo H; Huang J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Aug; 11(8):3604-3618. PubMed ID: 34341735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DH; Chung SR; Choi SH; Kim KW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5611-5624. PubMed ID: 32356157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of 665 thyroid nodules using both EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS classification systems.
Borges AP; Antunes C; Caseiro-Alves F; Donato P
Thyroid Res; 2023 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 37150822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
