BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34313905)

  • 1. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small-volume lymph node involvement and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.
    Morizane S; Honda M; Shimizu R; Teraoka S; Nishikawa R; Tsounapi P; Kimura Y; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Takenaka A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 25(7):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 32333202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
    Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center.
    Asimakopoulos AD; Annino F; Mugnier C; Lopez L; Hoepffner JL; Gaston R; Piechaud T
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6731-6745. PubMed ID: 33289056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.
    Abdollah F; Sood A; Sammon JD; Hsu L; Beyer B; Moschini M; Gandaglia G; Rogers CG; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 26119559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.
    Rajan P; Hagman A; Sooriakumaran P; Nyberg T; Wallerstedt A; Adding C; Akre O; Carlsson S; Hosseini A; Olsson M; Egevad L; Wiklund F; Steineck G; Wiklund NP
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28753802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.