123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34313920)
1. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications.
Huang S; Cai L
Psychometrika; 2021 Dec; 86(4):973-993. PubMed ID: 34313920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing.
Cai L
Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):535-59. PubMed ID: 25233839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Note on the Poisson's Binomial Distribution in Item Response Theory.
González J; Wiberg M; von Davier AA
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 29881055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.
Manea L; Gilbody S; McMillan D
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 2015; 37(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 25439733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time.
Marsman M; Sigurdardóttir H; Bolsinova M; Maris G
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):870-891. PubMed ID: 30919229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.
Cai L; Hansen M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):245-76. PubMed ID: 22642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The coexistence of coping resources and specific coping styles in stress: evidence from full information item bifactor analysis.
Zhang J; Cui M; Wang W; Lu H; Wu Q; Zhu X; Miao D; Zhang Y; Feng X; Xiao W
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96451. PubMed ID: 24787952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting gender differences as latent variables: summed scores, and individual item responses: a methods case study.
Pietrobon R; Taylor M; Guller U; Higgins LD; Jacobs DO; Carey T
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Oct; 2():59. PubMed ID: 15500700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Approximate Functional Relationship between IRT and CTT Item Discrimination Indices: A Simulation, Validation, and Practical Extension of Lord's (1980) Formula.
Kulas JT; Smith JA; Xu H
J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29252208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items.
Sinharay S; Jensen JL
Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):484-510. PubMed ID: 29951971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. IRT scoring procedures for TIMSS data.
Camilli G; Dossey JA
MethodsX; 2019; 6():1506-1511. PubMed ID: 31304098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A priori reliability of tests with cut score.
Magnano G; Tannoia C; Andrà C
Psychometrika; 2015 Mar; 80(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 24310845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Summed Score Likelihood-Based Indices for Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in Item Response Theory.
Li Z; Cai L
Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):857-886. PubMed ID: 32655173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
van Rijn PW; Ali US
Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: Explore Conditional Dependencies in Item Response Tree Data.
Jeon M
Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):803-808. PubMed ID: 37106310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Item-focussed Trees for the Identification of Items in Differential Item Functioning.
Tutz G; Berger M
Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):727-50. PubMed ID: 26596721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factor Tree Copula Models for Item Response Data.
Kadhem SH; Nikoloulopoulos AK
Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):776-802. PubMed ID: 37261648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
