These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314019)

  • 1. Dosimetry on first clinical dark-field chest radiography.
    Frank M; Urban T; Willer K; Noichl W; De Marco F; Schick R; Gleich B; Schegerer A; Lechel U; Meyer P; Mohr J; Koehler T; Yaroshenko A; Maack I; Pralow T; Proksa R; Renger B; Noël P; Fingerle A; Pfeiffer D; Rummeny E; Herzen J; Pfeiffer F
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6152-6159. PubMed ID: 34314019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of radiochromic film dosimetry protocol for volumetric dose assessments to various organs during diagnostic CT procedures.
    Brady S; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Frus D
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4782-92. PubMed ID: 20964198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeters for low-dose measurements in maxillofacial anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Koivisto JH; Wolff JE; Kiljunen T; Schulze D; Kortesniemi M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):266–278. PubMed ID: 26219008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
    Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dosimetry methods for panoramic radiography: thermoluminescent dosimeter measurement versus personal computer-based Monte Carlo method calculation.
    Lee C; Lee SS; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 26795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.
    Bor D; Sancak T; Olgar T; Elcim Y; Adanali A; Sanlidilek U; Akyar S
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):315-22. PubMed ID: 15107322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of image quality parameters with tube voltage in X-ray dark-field chest radiography: a phantom study.
    Sauter AP; Andrejewski J; Frank M; Willer K; Herzen J; Meurer F; Fingerle AA; Makowski MR; Pfeiffer F; Pfeiffer D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14130. PubMed ID: 34239040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studying the dose level for different X-ray energy conventional radiography by TLD-100.
    Ghoneam SM; Mahmoud KR; Diab HM; El-Sersy A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Mar; 181():110066. PubMed ID: 34968881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry.
    Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Sarder M; Barnes L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 17449779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Gonad protective effect of radiation protective apron in chest radiography].
    Hashimoto M; Kato H; Fujibuchi T; Ochi S; Morita F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1704-12. PubMed ID: 15614222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DETERMINATION OF THE PATIENTS' EFFECTIVE DOSES FOR MOST COMMON X-RAY EXAMINATIONS BY PHANTOM SIMULATION.
    Stadnyk LL; Nosyk OV
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2019 Dec; 24():180-194. PubMed ID: 31841466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray field size and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 24255139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.
    Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
    Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
    Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter.
    Endarko E; Pitaloka AW; Inayah AA; Ramadhan FR; Kardianto K; Rahayuningsih B
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2023 Apr; 13(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 37082553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
    Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.