These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314230)

  • 1. The Impact of Lasers in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials.
    Castellani D; Corrales M; Lim EJ; Cracco C; Scoffone CM; Teoh JY; Traxer O; Gauhar V
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 34314230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Gauhar V; Traxer O; García Rojo E; Scarcella S; Pavia MP; Chan VW; Pretore E; Wroclawski ML; Corrales M; Tiong HY; Lim EJ; Teoh JY; Heng CT; de la Rosette J; Somani BK; Castellani D
    Urolithiasis; 2022 Oct; 50(5):511-522. PubMed ID: 35674819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
    Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Guy's Stone Score Grade IV Kidney Stone.
    Hong Y; Lin H; Yang Q; Zhou D; Hou G; Chen X; Zheng J
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 32829337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.
    Pietropaolo A; Reeves T; Aboumarzouk O; Kallidonis P; Ozsoy M; Skolarikos A; Tailly T; Liatsikos E; Traxer O; Somani BK
    J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 31456421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials.
    Lai S; Jiao B; Diao T; Seery S; Hu M; Wang M; Hou H; Wang J; Zhang G; Liu M
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():205-217. PubMed ID: 32622059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety.
    Chen Y; Wen Y; Yu Q; Duan X; Wu W; Zeng G
    BMC Urol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 32711510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qin P; Zhang D; Huang T; Fang L; Cheng Y
    Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(4):637-648. PubMed ID: 34786926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.
    Ahmed AF; Abdelazim H; ElMesery M; El-Feky M; Gomaa A; Tagreda I; Abozied H; Fahim A
    BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128(6):744-751. PubMed ID: 34028170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PCNL vs. two staged RIRS for kidney stones greater than 20 mm: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
    Constantinou BT; Benedicto BC; Porto BC; Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Artifon EL; Otoch JP; da Cruz JA
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Feb; 76(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 38426420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tsai SH; Chung HJ; Tseng PT; Wu YC; Tu YK; Hsu CW; Lei WT
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19403. PubMed ID: 32150088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
    He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials.
    Awedew AF; Alemu CT; Yalew DZ
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Jun; 51(1):87. PubMed ID: 37289253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Efficacy and Complications of Soft Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Han W; Ge J; Xu X
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():5829205. PubMed ID: 35813431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser with MOSES technology is more efficient than thulium fibre laser in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Vergamini LB; Ito W; Choi B N; Du HE; Sardiu ME; Neff D; Duchene DA; Molina WR; Whiles BB
    BJU Int; 2024 Aug; 134(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 38797721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.
    Wan C; Wang D; Xiang J; Yang B; Xu J; Zhou G; Zhou Y; Zhao Y; Zhong J; Liu J
    Urolithiasis; 2022 Oct; 50(5):523-533. PubMed ID: 35953608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.
    Lee JY; Jeh SU; Kim MD; Kang DH; Kwon JK; Ham WS; Choi YD; Cho KS
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28655317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen Y; Feng J; Duan H; Yue Y; Zhang C; Deng T; Zeng G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206810. PubMed ID: 30703102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.