390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314554)
1. Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chang OH; Cadish LA; Kailasam A; Ridgeway BM; Shepherd JP
BJOG; 2022 Feb; 129(3):500-508. PubMed ID: 34314554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Richardson ML; Sokol ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):565.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25019485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy combined with midurethral sling surgery vs surgery alone among women with mixed urinary incontinence: results of the Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced With Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence randomized trial.
Harvie HS; Sung VW; Neuwahl SJ; Honeycutt AA; Meyer I; Chermansky CJ; Menefee S; Hendrickson WK; Dunivan GC; Mazloomdoost D; Bass SJ; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):651.e1-651.e26. PubMed ID: 34242627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.
Abdel-Fattah M; Cooper D; Davidson T; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Bhal K; McDonald A; Wardle J; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; Norrie J
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(47):1-190. PubMed ID: 36520097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midurethral slings for women with stress urinary incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(3):1-61. PubMed ID: 23074494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Richardson ML; Elliott CS; Shaw JG; Comiter CV; Chen B; Sokol ER
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1306-12. PubMed ID: 23524201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Rehman H; Bezerra CA; Bruschini H; Cody JD; Aluko P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD001754. PubMed ID: 28743177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Single-Incision Midurethral Sling with Bulking Agents for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Rationale for a Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Osse NJE; Schonewille MEA; Engberts MK; Blanker MH; Klerkx WM; van Eijndhoven HWF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 36716732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Fusco F; Abdel-Fattah M; Chapple CR; Creta M; La Falce S; Waltregny D; Novara G
Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):567-591. PubMed ID: 28479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current treatments for female primary stress urinary incontinence.
Itkonen Freitas AM; Rahkola-Soisalo P; Mikkola TS; Mentula M
Climacteric; 2019 Jun; 22(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 30773062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications.
Osman NI; Hillary CJ; Mangera A; Aldamanhoori R; Inman RD; Chapple CR
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 29803585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The SIMS trial: adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings versus standard tension-free midurethral slings in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. A study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.
Abdel-Fattah M; MacLennan G; Kilonzo M; Assassa RP; McCormick K; Davidson T; McDonald A; N'Dow J; Wardle J; Norrie J
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015111. PubMed ID: 28801396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Autologous Rectus Fascial Sling Versus Retropubic Midurethral Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Jia X; Wang R; Hall C; Flynn MK
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):104-112. PubMed ID: 36735421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.
Foss Hansen M; Lose G; Kesmodel US; Gradel KO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 26344752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female Sexual Function Following Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bicudo-Fürst MC; Borba Leite PH; Araújo Glina FP; Baccaglini W; de Carvalho Fürst RV; Bezerra CA; Glina S
Sex Med Rev; 2018 Apr; 6(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 29289535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
van der Ploeg JM; van der Steen A; Oude Rengerink K; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 24382099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost utility of the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Von Bargen E; Patterson D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 25679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
