148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314756)
1. Comparing visual inspection and performance observation for evaluation of hospital cleanliness.
Chen YC; Huang HM; Lin PY; Shi ZY
Am J Infect Control; 2021 Dec; 49(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 34314756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center.
Huang YS; Chen YC; Chen ML; Cheng A; Hung IC; Wang JT; Sheng WH; Chang SC
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Aug; 43(8):882-6. PubMed ID: 25952617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The adenosine triphosphate method as a quality control tool to assess 'cleanliness' of frequently touched hospital surfaces.
Knape L; Hambraeus A; Lytsy B
J Hosp Infect; 2015 Oct; 91(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 26213368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay.
Boyce JM; Havill NL; Dumigan DG; Golebiewski M; Balogun O; Rizvani R
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 30(7):678-84. PubMed ID: 19489715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of a fluorescent marker with quantitative bioburden methods to assess cleanliness.
Hung IC; Chang HY; Cheng A; Chen AC; Ting L; Chen MW; Lai YH; Sheng WH
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1296-1300. PubMed ID: 30221609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review.
Nante N; Ceriale E; Messina G; Lenzi D; Manzi P
J Prev Med Hyg; 2017 Jun; 58(2):E177-E183. PubMed ID: 28900359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting.
Moore G; Smyth D; Singleton J; Wilson P
Am J Infect Control; 2010 Oct; 38(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 20605265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals.
Malik RE; Cooper RA; Griffith CJ
Am J Infect Control; 2003 May; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 12734526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations.
Sanna T; Dallolio L; Raggi A; Mazzetti M; Lorusso G; Zanni A; Farruggia P; Leoni E
BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Nov; 18(1):583. PubMed ID: 30453892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating bio-burden of frequently touched surfaces using Adenosine Triphosphate bioluminescence (ATP): Results from the Researching Effective Approaches to Cleaning in Hospitals (REACH) trial.
Mitchell BG; McGhie A; Whiteley G; Farrington A; Hall L; Halton K; White NM
Infect Dis Health; 2020 Aug; 25(3):168-174. PubMed ID: 32234296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring the effectiveness of daily cleaning practices in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay.
Deshpande A; Dunn AN; Fox J; Cadnum JL; Mana TSC; Jencson A; Fraser TG; Donskey CJ; Gordon SM
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Jul; 48(7):757-760. PubMed ID: 31883729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing health care-associated infections by implementing separated environmental cleaning management measures by using disposable wipes of four colors.
Wong SS; Huang CH; Yang CC; Hsieh YP; Kuo CN; Chen YR; Chen LC
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():34. PubMed ID: 29541446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of hospital daily cleaning practices using ATP bioluminescence in a developing country.
Zambrano AA; Jones A; Otero P; Ajenjo MC; Labarca JA
Braz J Infect Dis; 2014; 18(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 25193079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods.
Luick L; Thompson PA; Loock MH; Vetter SL; Cook J; Guerrero DM
Am J Infect Control; 2013 Aug; 41(8):751-2. PubMed ID: 23380380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.
Boyce JM; Havill NL; Havill HL; Mangione E; Dumigan DG; Moore BA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1187-93. PubMed ID: 22080657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring the effectiveness of cleaning in four British hospitals.
Cooper RA; Griffith CJ; Malik RE; Obee P; Looker N
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Jun; 35(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 17577482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of human factors engineering approach to improve environmental cleaning and disinfection in a medical center.
Hung IC; Chang HY; Cheng A; Chen MW; Chen AC; Ting L; Lai YH; Wang JT; Chen YC; Sheng WH
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2020; 9(1):17. PubMed ID: 31988745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of different monitoring methods of surface cleanliness in operating rooms.
Nascimento EADS; Poveda VB; Monteiro J
Rev Bras Enferm; 2021; 74(3):e20201263. PubMed ID: 34259734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applicability of the ATP assay in monitoring the cleanliness of hospital environments.
Ishino N; Miyaji C; Ogata M; Inada M; Nagata M; Shimamoto M
Infect Dis Health; 2024 Feb; 29(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37989685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of percent positive agreement between fluorescent marker and ATPase for environmental cleaning monitoring during sequential application in an intensive care unit.
Burnham JP; Shives ER; Warren DK; Han JH; Babcock HM;
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Apr; 48(4):454-455. PubMed ID: 31744633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
