389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314941)
1. Effect of synchronous online vs. face-to-face cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on chest compression quality: A pilot randomized manikin study.
Lin L; Ni S; Cheng J; Zhang Z; Zeng R; Jin X; Zhao Y
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Dec; 50():80-84. PubMed ID: 34314941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest.
Jiang J; Yan J; Yao D; Xiao J; Chen R; Zhao Y; Jin X
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Mar; 19(1):159. PubMed ID: 38539244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin.
Krasteva V; Jekova I; Didon JP
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jun; 32(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 21606561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality retention of chest compression after repetitive practices with or without feedback devices: A randomized manikin study.
Zhou XL; Wang J; Jin XQ; Zhao Y; Liu RL; Jiang C
Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jan; 38(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 31005392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of chest compressions with the use of a new audio-visual feedback device: a randomized manikin study in health care professionals.
Wutzler A; Bannehr M; von Ulmenstein S; Loehr L; Förster J; Kühnle Y; Finn A; Storm C; Haverkamp W
Resuscitation; 2015 Feb; 87():81-5. PubMed ID: 25449342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nas J; Thannhauser J; Vart P; van Geuns RJ; Muijsers HEC; Mol JQ; Aarts GWA; Konijnenberg LSF; Gommans DHF; Ahoud-Schoenmakers SGAM; Vos JL; van Royen N; Bonnes JL; Brouwer MA
JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 5(3):328-335. PubMed ID: 31734702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Randomized Control Trial of Cardiopulmonary Feedback Devices and Their Impact on Infant Chest Compression Quality: A Simulation Study.
Austin AL; Spalding CN; Landa KN; Myer BR; Cure D; Smith JE; Platt G; King HC
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Feb; 36(2):e79-e84. PubMed ID: 29084067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantage and Limitation of Using a Visual Feedback Device during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training.
Kim CW; Oh JH
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2020 Feb; 35(1):104-108. PubMed ID: 31910923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs. Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
McCoy CE; Rahman A; Rendon JC; Anderson CL; Langdorf MI; Lotfipour S; Chakravarthy B
West J Emerg Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30643596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of real-time visual feedback device 'Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (QCPR) Classroom' with a metronome sound on layperson CPR training in Japan: a cluster randomized control trial.
Tanaka S; Tsukigase K; Hara T; Sagisaka R; Myklebust H; Birkenes TS; Takahashi H; Iwata A; Kidokoro Y; Yamada M; Ueta H; Takyu H; Tanaka H
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e026140. PubMed ID: 31189674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised control trial of prompt and feedback devices and their impact on quality of chest compressions--a simulation study.
Yeung J; Davies R; Gao F; Perkins GD
Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 24463223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of instructor assessment of chest compression quality during simulated resuscitation.
Brennan EE; McGraw RC; Brooks SC
CJEM; 2016 Jul; 18(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 26775890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate and 1-year chest compression quality: effect of instantaneous feedback in simulated cardiac arrest.
Griffin P; Cooper C; Glick J; Terndrup TE
Simul Healthc; 2014 Aug; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 24787561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of Audiovisual Feedback During Standard Compressions Is Associated with Improved Ability.
Aguilar SA; Asakawa N; Saffer C; Williams C; Chuh S; Duan L
West J Emerg Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):437-444. PubMed ID: 29560078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback: A Comparison of Device-Measured and Self-Assessed Chest Compression Quality.
Picard C; Yang BG; Norris C; McIntosh S; Douma MJ
J Emerg Nurs; 2021 Mar; 47(2):333-341.e1. PubMed ID: 33308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CPR feedback/prompt device improves the quality of hands-only CPR performed in manikin by laypersons following the 2015 AHA guidelines.
Liu Y; Huang Z; Li H; Zheng G; Ling Q; Tang W; Yang Z
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1980-1985. PubMed ID: 29525478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing.
Dine CJ; Gersh RE; Leary M; Riegel BJ; Bellini LM; Abella BS
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2817-22. PubMed ID: 18766092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study.
Semeraro F; Frisoli A; Loconsole C; Bannò F; Tammaro G; Imbriaco G; Marchetti L; Cerchiari EL
Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 23238423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
