These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34314994)

  • 1. Filling the gap in gap-filling: Long-distance dependency formation in sentence production.
    Momma S
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Sep; 129():101411. PubMed ID: 34314994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond linear order: The role of argument structure in speaking.
    Momma S; Ferreira VS
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Aug; 128():101397. PubMed ID: 34172262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children.
    Marinis T; van der Lely HK
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2007; 42(5):557-82. PubMed ID: 17729146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A verb-frame frequency account of constraints on long-distance dependencies in English.
    Liu Y; Ryskin R; Futrell R; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():104902. PubMed ID: 34583835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond linear order: The role of argument structure in speaking.
    Momma S; Ferreira VS
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Nov; 114():101228. PubMed ID: 31421521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grammatical Planning Units During Real-Time Sentence Production in Speakers With Agrammatic Aphasia and Healthy Speakers.
    Lee J; Yoshida M; Thompson CK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 58(4):1182-94. PubMed ID: 25908309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working Memory in the Processing of Long-Distance Dependencies: Interference and Filler Maintenance.
    Ness T; Meltzer-Asscher A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 28528512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit Statistical Learning in L2 Sentence Processing: Individual Cognitive Differences.
    Lee OS
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1037-1060. PubMed ID: 37016091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wh-filler-gap dependency formation guides reflexive antecedent search.
    Frazier M; Ackerman L; Baumann P; Potter D; Yoshida M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1504. PubMed ID: 26500579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.
    Cho-Reyes S; Mack JE; Thompson CK
    J Mem Lang; 2016 Dec; 91():202-218. PubMed ID: 28924328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Distance between Marker Agreement Dependencies on Sentence Comprehension in Persons with Aphasia.
    Darshan HS; Goswami SP
    Ann Indian Acad Neurol; 2020 Sep; 23(Suppl 2):S149-S155. PubMed ID: 33343140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects.
    Tollan R; Palaz B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():658364. PubMed ID: 34093349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning to speak in L1 and L2.
    Konopka AE; Meyer A; Forest TA
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 May; 102():72-104. PubMed ID: 29407637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.
    Franck J; Colonna S; Rizzi L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():349. PubMed ID: 25914652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length.
    Chow WY; Zhou Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 30238828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Syntactic Creativity Errors in Children's Wh-Questions.
    Lutken CJ; Legendre G; Omaki A
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 44(7):e12849. PubMed ID: 32608064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of others' synchronous and asynchronous sentences interferes with sentence production.
    Gambi C; Van de Cavey J; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jan; 76(1):180-195. PubMed ID: 35102784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages.
    Liu H; Xu C; Liang J
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Jul; 21():171-193. PubMed ID: 28624589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.