163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34315027)
1. Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus of cochlear implanted rats with or without hearing experience.
Buck AN; Rosskothen-Kuhl N; Schnupp JW
Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 408():108305. PubMed ID: 34315027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation Partially Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity in Neonatally-Deaf Rabbits.
Sunwoo W; Delgutte B; Chung Y
J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(16):3651-3664. PubMed ID: 33687960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
Vollmer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants.
Smith ZM; Delgutte B
J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 27(25):6740-50. PubMed ID: 17581961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness.
Hancock KE; Noel V; Ryugo DK; Delgutte B
J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(42):14068-79. PubMed ID: 20962228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaural time difference tuning in the rat inferior colliculus is predictive of behavioral sensitivity.
Li K; Rajendran VG; Mishra AP; Chan CHK; Schnupp JWH
Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108331. PubMed ID: 34416492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.
Chung Y; Buechel BD; Sunwoo W; Wagner JD; Delgutte B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 30623319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal Deafening Selectively Degrades the Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences of Electrical Stimuli in Low-Frequency Pathways in Rats.
Sunwoo W
eNeuro; 2023 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 36609304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Provision of interaural time difference information in chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation enhances neural sensitivity to these differences in neonatally deafened cats.
Thompson AC; Irvine DRF; Fallon JB
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108253. PubMed ID: 33971428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.
Chung Y; Hancock KE; Delgutte B
J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(20):5520-31. PubMed ID: 27194332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.
Buck AN; Buchholz S; Schnupp JW; Rosskothen-Kuhl N
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3785. PubMed ID: 36882473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.
Rosskothen-Kuhl N; Buck AN; Li K; Schnupp JW
Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33427644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Congenital and prolonged adult-onset deafness cause distinct degradations in neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants.
Hancock KE; Chung Y; Delgutte B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 14(3):393-411. PubMed ID: 23462803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to interaural time differences in the envelope versus the fine structure with bilateral cochlear implants.
Smith ZM; Delgutte B
J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2390-407. PubMed ID: 18287556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing.
Hartley DE; Isaiah A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104097. PubMed ID: 25093417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
